Biomechanical Comparison of Different External Fixation Configurations for Posttraumatic Pelvic Ring Instability
المؤلفون المشاركون
Werner, Clément M. L.
Ferguson, Stephen J.
Scheyerer, Max J.
Simmen, Hans-Peter
Spreiter, Gregor
Spinas, Gian-Leza
Wanner, Guido A.
Tiziani, Simon
Osterhoff, Georg
المصدر
Advances in Orthopedic Surgery
العدد
المجلد 2014، العدد 2014 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2014)، ص ص. 1-5، 5ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2014-02-02
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
5
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Background.
External fixation is useful in the primary treatment of pelvic ring injuries.
The present study compared the biomechanical stability of five different configurations of an external pelvic ring fixation system.
Methods.
Five configurations of an anterior external pelvic ring fixation system were tested using a universal testing machine.
One single connecting rod was used in group “SINGLE,” two parallel connecting rods in group “DOUBLE,” two and four rods, respectively, in a tent-like configuration in groups “SINGLE TENT” and “DOUBLE TENT,” and a rhomboid-like configuration in group “RHOMBOID.” Each specimen was subjected to a total of 2000 consecutive cyclic loadings at 1 Hz lateral compression/distraction (±50 N) and torque (±0.5 Nm) loading alternating every 200 cycles.
Translational and rotational stiffness were determined at 100, 300, 500, 700, and 900 cycles.
Results.
The “SINGLE TENT” and “RHOMBOID” configurations already failed with a preloading of 50 N compression force.
The “DOUBLE” configuration had around twice the translational stability compared with the “SINGLE” and “DOUBLE TENT” configurations.
Rotational stiffness observed for the “DOUBLE” and “DOUBLE TENT” configurations was about 50% higher compared to the SINGLE configuration.
Conclusion.
Using two parallel connecting rods provides the highest translational and rotational stability.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Tiziani, Simon& Osterhoff, Georg& Ferguson, Stephen J.& Spreiter, Gregor& Scheyerer, Max J.& Spinas, Gian-Leza…[et al.]. 2014. Biomechanical Comparison of Different External Fixation Configurations for Posttraumatic Pelvic Ring Instability. Advances in Orthopedic Surgery،Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-465775
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Tiziani, Simon…[et al.]. Biomechanical Comparison of Different External Fixation Configurations for Posttraumatic Pelvic Ring Instability. Advances in Orthopedic Surgery No. 2014 (2014), pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-465775
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Tiziani, Simon& Osterhoff, Georg& Ferguson, Stephen J.& Spreiter, Gregor& Scheyerer, Max J.& Spinas, Gian-Leza…[et al.]. Biomechanical Comparison of Different External Fixation Configurations for Posttraumatic Pelvic Ring Instability. Advances in Orthopedic Surgery. 2014. Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-465775
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-465775
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر