![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Laparoscopic Intraoperative Cholangiography Interpretation by Surgeons versus Radiologists, A Comparative Study and Review of 200 Cholangiographies
المؤلفون المشاركون
El-Hennawy, Hany M.
Badi, Ahmed M.
El Omari, Ibrahem M.
Bedair, El Said M. A.
Abdel Aziz, Ashraf A.
El-Kahlout, Eihab A.
المصدر
ISRN Minimally Invasive Surgery
العدد
المجلد 2012، العدد 2012 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2012)، ص ص. 1-5، 5ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2012-09-05
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
5
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Introduction.
In some medical centers, LIOC are exclusively interpreted by surgeons.
The degree of accuracy of surgeon’s interpretation compared to that of radiologist (gold standard) and its clinical significance are not well studied.
Objective.
study whether surgeons are accurate in interpreting IOC or not by comparing the interpretation of LIOC by surgeons to the postoperative interpretation of same cholangiograms by radiologists, and study its clinical significance.
Methods.
A retrospective study of 200 consecutive patients who underwent selective LIOC in Al-Khor community hospital in Qatar during the period from May 2005 till December 2011.
A radiology senior consultant blindly reviewed the cholangiograms (Reading B) then we compared these findings (ductal dilatation, defects of filling and passage of contrast into duodenum) to LIOC results that were reported intraoperatively by surgeons for the same patients (Reading A).
Results.
Ductal dilatation was found in (27.5%) of Reading A compared to 19% in Reading B.
filling defects were reported in (20.5%) of Reading A compared to 14.5% in Reading B.
Conclusion.
there is significant difference of LIOC interpretation between surgeons and radiologist specially in the detection of defects of fillings although this variability did not affect the clinical outcome.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
El-Hennawy, Hany M.& El-Kahlout, Eihab A.& Bedair, El Said M. A.& El Omari, Ibrahem M.& Abdel Aziz, Ashraf A.& Badi, Ahmed M.. 2012. Laparoscopic Intraoperative Cholangiography Interpretation by Surgeons versus Radiologists, A Comparative Study and Review of 200 Cholangiographies. ISRN Minimally Invasive Surgery،Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-473931
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
El-Hennawy, Hany M.…[et al.]. Laparoscopic Intraoperative Cholangiography Interpretation by Surgeons versus Radiologists, A Comparative Study and Review of 200 Cholangiographies. ISRN Minimally Invasive Surgery No. 2012 (2012), pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-473931
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
El-Hennawy, Hany M.& El-Kahlout, Eihab A.& Bedair, El Said M. A.& El Omari, Ibrahem M.& Abdel Aziz, Ashraf A.& Badi, Ahmed M.. Laparoscopic Intraoperative Cholangiography Interpretation by Surgeons versus Radiologists, A Comparative Study and Review of 200 Cholangiographies. ISRN Minimally Invasive Surgery. 2012. Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-473931
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-473931
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)