![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
KPG Index versus OPG Measurements : A Comparison between 3D and 2D Methods in Predicting Treatment Duration and Difficulty Level for Patients with Impacted Maxillary Canines
المؤلفون المشاركون
Dalessandri, Domenico
Migliorati, Marco
Contardo, Luca
Martin, Conchita
Kau, Chung How
Visconti, Luca
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2014، العدد 2014 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2014)، ص ص. 1-8، 8ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2014-07-09
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
8
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Aim.
The aim of this study was to test the agreement between orthopantomography (OPG) based 2D measurements and the KPG index, a new index based on 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images, in predicting orthodontic treatment duration and difficulty level of impacted maxillary canines.
Materials and Methods.
OPG and CBCT images of 105 impacted canines were independently scored by three orthodontists at t0 and after 1 month (t1), using the KPG index and the following 2D methods: distance from cusp tip and occlusal plane, cusp tip position in relation to the lateral incisor, and canine inclination.
Pearson’s coefficients were used to evaluate the degree of agreement and the χ2 with Yates correction test was used to assess the independence between them.
Results.
Inter- and intrarater reliability were higher with KPG compared to 2D methods.
Pearson’s coefficients showed a statistically significant association between all the indexes, while the χ2 with Yates correction test resulted in a statistically significant rejection of independency only for one 2D index.
Conclusions.
2D indexes for predicting impacted maxillary canines treatment duration and difficulty sometimes are discordant; a 3D index like the KPG index could be useful in solving these conflicts.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Dalessandri, Domenico& Migliorati, Marco& Visconti, Luca& Contardo, Luca& Kau, Chung How& Martin, Conchita. 2014. KPG Index versus OPG Measurements : A Comparison between 3D and 2D Methods in Predicting Treatment Duration and Difficulty Level for Patients with Impacted Maxillary Canines. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-479638
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Dalessandri, Domenico…[et al.]. KPG Index versus OPG Measurements : A Comparison between 3D and 2D Methods in Predicting Treatment Duration and Difficulty Level for Patients with Impacted Maxillary Canines. BioMed Research International No. 2014 (2014), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-479638
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Dalessandri, Domenico& Migliorati, Marco& Visconti, Luca& Contardo, Luca& Kau, Chung How& Martin, Conchita. KPG Index versus OPG Measurements : A Comparison between 3D and 2D Methods in Predicting Treatment Duration and Difficulty Level for Patients with Impacted Maxillary Canines. BioMed Research International. 2014. Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-479638
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-479638
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)