![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
The Feasibility of Societal Cost Equivalence between Robotic Hysterectomy and Alternate Hysterectomy Methods for Endometrial Cancer
المؤلفون المشاركون
Wright, Kelly N.
Einarsson, Jon I.
Jonsdottir, Gudrun M.
Shah, Neel T.
Muto, Michael G.
Jorgensen, Selena
المصدر
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
العدد
المجلد 2011، العدد 2011 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2011)، ص ص. 1-9، 9ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2011-11-15
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
9
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Objectives.
We assess whether it is feasible for robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer to be less expensive to society than traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy.
Methods.
We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patient characteristics, operative times, complications, and hospital charges from all (n=234) endometrial cancer patients who underwent hysterectomy in 2009 at our hospital.
Per patient costs of each hysterectomy method were examined from the societal perspective.
Sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were performed using a cost-minimization model.
Results.
40 (17.1%) of hysterectomies for endometrial cancer were robotic, 91 (38.9%), were abdominal, and 103 (44.0%) were laparoscopic.
96.3% of the variation in operative cost between patients was predicted by operative time (R=0.963, P<0.01).
Mean operative time for robotic hysterectomy was significantly longer than other methods (P<0.01).
Abdominal hysterectomy was consistently the most expensive while the traditional laparoscopic approach was consistently least expensive.
The threshold in operative time that makes robotic hysterectomy cost equivalent to the abdominal approach is within the range of our experience.
Conclusion.
It is feasible for robotic hysterectomy to be less expensive than abdominal hysterectomy, but unlikely for robotic hysterectomy to be less expensive than traditional laparoscopy.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Shah, Neel T.& Wright, Kelly N.& Jonsdottir, Gudrun M.& Jorgensen, Selena& Einarsson, Jon I.& Muto, Michael G.. 2011. The Feasibility of Societal Cost Equivalence between Robotic Hysterectomy and Alternate Hysterectomy Methods for Endometrial Cancer. Obstetrics and Gynecology International،Vol. 2011, no. 2011, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-481589
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Shah, Neel T.…[et al.]. The Feasibility of Societal Cost Equivalence between Robotic Hysterectomy and Alternate Hysterectomy Methods for Endometrial Cancer. Obstetrics and Gynecology International No. 2011 (2011), pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-481589
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Shah, Neel T.& Wright, Kelly N.& Jonsdottir, Gudrun M.& Jorgensen, Selena& Einarsson, Jon I.& Muto, Michael G.. The Feasibility of Societal Cost Equivalence between Robotic Hysterectomy and Alternate Hysterectomy Methods for Endometrial Cancer. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2011. Vol. 2011, no. 2011, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-481589
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-481589
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)