![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Adequacy of the Endometrial Samples Obtained by the Uterine Explora Device and Conventional Dilatation and Curettage : A Comparative Study
المؤلفون المشاركون
Aljasser, Rakia
Adi, Yaser
Arafah, Maria Abdulrahim
Cherkess Al-Rikabi, Ammar
المصدر
International Journal of Reproductive Medicine
العدد
المجلد 2014، العدد 2014 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2014)، ص ص. 1-5، 5ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2014-01-08
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
5
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Aims.
Our aim is to compare the adequacy and diagnostic yield of samples obtained by the endometrial Explora Sampler I-MX120 with endometrial specimens obtained by conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C).
Methods.
A total of 1270 endometrial samples were received in the histopathology laboratories at the King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2007 and 2010.
In the outpatient clinic, the Uterine Explora Model I was used to obtain 996 samples.
The remaining 274 samples were obtained by conventional D&C.
Sample adequacy and the clustering of inadequate specimens according to age groups by the two different techniques were compared and statistically analyzed.
Results.
Out of 1270 endometrial samples, 253 (19.9%) were inadequate.
The Uterine Explora was used in 88.5% of these inadequate samples (253 samples), and the remaining 11.5% were obtained by D&C.
The insufficient tissue incidence was higher with the Explora (17.6%) than with the D&C (2.2%) and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.0001).
The ages of the patients, as well as the clinical indications for the procedures, were recorded.
Conclusion.
This retrospective study demonstrated better specimen adequacy when D&C was used compared to the higher rate of sample insufficiency obtained with the Explora.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Arafah, Maria Abdulrahim& Cherkess Al-Rikabi, Ammar& Aljasser, Rakia& Adi, Yaser. 2014. Adequacy of the Endometrial Samples Obtained by the Uterine Explora Device and Conventional Dilatation and Curettage : A Comparative Study. International Journal of Reproductive Medicine،Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-482187
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Arafah, Maria Abdulrahim…[et al.]. Adequacy of the Endometrial Samples Obtained by the Uterine Explora Device and Conventional Dilatation and Curettage : A Comparative Study. International Journal of Reproductive Medicine No. 2014 (2014), pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-482187
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Arafah, Maria Abdulrahim& Cherkess Al-Rikabi, Ammar& Aljasser, Rakia& Adi, Yaser. Adequacy of the Endometrial Samples Obtained by the Uterine Explora Device and Conventional Dilatation and Curettage : A Comparative Study. International Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2014. Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-482187
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-482187
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)