Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy with Sodium Phosphate Solution versus Polyethylene Glycol-Based Lavage : A Multicenter Trial
المؤلفون المشاركون
Frick, B.
Küppers, B.
Mickisch, O.
Schenck, B.
Hüppe, D.
Heiland, G.
Schanz, S.
Horstkotte, H.
Berg, P.
Kruis, Wolfgang
Winkler, A.
المصدر
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy
العدد
المجلد 2008، العدد 2008 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2008)، ص ص. 1-6، 6ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2008-07-14
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
6
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Background: Adequate bowel preparation is essential for accurate colonoscopy.
Both oral sodium phosphate (NaP) and polyethylene glycol-based lavage (PEG-ELS) are used predominantly as bowel cleansing modalities.
NaP has gained popularity due to low drinking volume and lower costs.
The purpose of this randomized multicenter observer blinded study was to compare three groups of cleansing (NaP, NaP + sennosides, PEG-ELS + sennosides) in reference to tolerability, acceptance, and cleanliness.
Patient and Methods: 355 outpatients between 18 and 75 years were randomized into three groups (A, B, C) receiving NaP = A, NaP, and sennosides = B or PEG-ELS and sennosides = C.
Gastroenterologists performing colonoscopies were blinded to the type of preparation.
All patients documented tolerance and adverse events.
Vital signs, premedication, completeness, discomfort, and complications were recorded.
A quality score (0–4) of cleanliness was generated.
Results: The three groups were similar with regard to age, sex, BMI, indication for colonoscopy, and comorbidity.
Drinking volumes (L) (A = 4.33 + 1.2, B = 4.56 + 1.18, C = 4.93 + 1.71) were in favor of NaP (P = .005).
Discomfort from ingested fluid was recorded in A = 39.8% (versus C: P = .015), B = 46.6% (versus C: P = .147), and C = 54.6%.
Differences in tolerability and acceptance between the three groups were statistically not significant.
No differences in adverse events and the cleanliness effects occurred in the three groups (P = .113).
The cleanliness quality scores 0–2 were calculated in A: 77.7%, B: 86.7%, and C: 85.2%.
Conclusions: These data fail to demonstrate significant differences in tolerability, acceptance, and preparation quality between the three types of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Cleansing with NaP was not superior to PEG-ELS.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Schanz, S.& Kruis, Wolfgang& Mickisch, O.& Küppers, B.& Berg, P.& Frick, B.…[et al.]. 2008. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy with Sodium Phosphate Solution versus Polyethylene Glycol-Based Lavage : A Multicenter Trial. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy،Vol. 2008, no. 2008, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-492630
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Schanz, S.…[et al.]. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy with Sodium Phosphate Solution versus Polyethylene Glycol-Based Lavage : A Multicenter Trial. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy No. 2008 (2008), pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-492630
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Schanz, S.& Kruis, Wolfgang& Mickisch, O.& Küppers, B.& Berg, P.& Frick, B.…[et al.]. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy with Sodium Phosphate Solution versus Polyethylene Glycol-Based Lavage : A Multicenter Trial. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy. 2008. Vol. 2008, no. 2008, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-492630
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-492630
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر