![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Comparison of Reaction Response Time between Hand and Foot Controlled Devices in Simulated Microsurgical Testing
المؤلفون المشاركون
Falabella, Paulo
Stefanini, Francisco R.
Koss, Michael J.
Humayun, Mark S.
Pfister, Marcel
Lue, Jaw-Chyng L.
Dustin, Laurie
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2014، العدد 2014 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2014)، ص ص. 1-8، 8ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2014-07-06
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
8
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Purpose.
We hypothesized that reaction times (RTs) for a switch release are faster for hand-controlled than for foot-controlled switches for physiological and anatomical reasons (e.g., nerve conduction speed).
The risk of accidental trauma could be reduced if the surgeon reacted quicker and therefore improve the surgical outcome.
Method.
We included 47 medical professionals at USC.
Demographics and handedness were recorded.
Under a microscope, a simple reaction time test was performed, testing all extremities multiple times in a random order.
Additionally, a subjective questionnaire was administered.
Results.
The mean RTs for hands are 318.24 ms ± 51.13 and feet 328.69±48.70.
The comparison of hand versus foot showed significant shorter RTs for the hand (P=0.025).
Partially significant differences between and within the experience level groups could be demonstrated by level of education (LE) and microscopic surgeries/week (MSW) (P=0.57–0.02).
In the subjective questionnaire, 91.5% (n=43/47) of test subjects prefer to use hand controls.
Conclusion.
Our data show that the RT for hands is faster than feet.
Similarly the subjective questionnaire showed a greater preference for hand actuation.
This data suggest a hand-controlled ophthalmic instrument might have distinct advantages; however, clinical correlation is required.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Pfister, Marcel& Lue, Jaw-Chyng L.& Stefanini, Francisco R.& Falabella, Paulo& Dustin, Laurie& Koss, Michael J.…[et al.]. 2014. Comparison of Reaction Response Time between Hand and Foot Controlled Devices in Simulated Microsurgical Testing. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-497329
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Pfister, Marcel…[et al.]. Comparison of Reaction Response Time between Hand and Foot Controlled Devices in Simulated Microsurgical Testing. BioMed Research International No. 2014 (2014), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-497329
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Pfister, Marcel& Lue, Jaw-Chyng L.& Stefanini, Francisco R.& Falabella, Paulo& Dustin, Laurie& Koss, Michael J.…[et al.]. Comparison of Reaction Response Time between Hand and Foot Controlled Devices in Simulated Microsurgical Testing. BioMed Research International. 2014. Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-497329
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-497329
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)