Comparison between Investigational IR and Crystallographic Data with Computational Chemistry Tools as Validation of the Methods

المؤلفون المشاركون

Parameswaran, Geetha
Abdul Jaleel, U. C.
Rakhila, M.

المصدر

Advances in Physical Chemistry

العدد

المجلد 2010، العدد 2010 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2010)، ص ص. 1-5، 5ص.

الناشر

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

تاريخ النشر

2010-05-31

دولة النشر

مصر

عدد الصفحات

5

التخصصات الرئيسية

الكيمياء

الملخص EN

Computational tools, specifically molecular mechanical force field (MM+) and semiempirical (PM3) and density functional methods (DFT) are applied to sets of schiff bases and their complexes.

The results are compared with experimental data.

It is also found that the simulated IR spectra are in consistence with the experimental data.

نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)

Abdul Jaleel, U. C.& Rakhila, M.& Parameswaran, Geetha. 2010. Comparison between Investigational IR and Crystallographic Data with Computational Chemistry Tools as Validation of the Methods. Advances in Physical Chemistry،Vol. 2010, no. 2010, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-498119

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)

Abdul Jaleel, U. C.…[et al.]. Comparison between Investigational IR and Crystallographic Data with Computational Chemistry Tools as Validation of the Methods. Advances in Physical Chemistry No. 2010 (2010), pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-498119

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)

Abdul Jaleel, U. C.& Rakhila, M.& Parameswaran, Geetha. Comparison between Investigational IR and Crystallographic Data with Computational Chemistry Tools as Validation of the Methods. Advances in Physical Chemistry. 2010. Vol. 2010, no. 2010, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-498119

نوع البيانات

مقالات

لغة النص

الإنجليزية

الملاحظات

Includes bibliographical references

رقم السجل

BIM-498119