A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Caudal Block as Compared to Noncaudal Regional Techniques for Inguinal Surgeries in Children
المؤلفون المشاركون
Guyatt, Gordon
Shanthanna, Harsha
Singh, Balpreet
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2014، العدد 2014 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2014)، ص ص. 1-17، 17ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2014-08-05
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
17
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
This systematic review and meta-analysis were designed to compare the analgesic effectiveness and adverse effects with the use of caudal analgesia as compared to noncaudal regional analgesia techniques in children undergoing inguinal surgeries.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (Cochrane) databases were searched for randomized control trials published in English language from 1946 up to 2013.
Use of rescue analgesia and adverse effects were considered as primary and secondary outcomes, respectively.
Outcomes were pooled using random effects model and reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI.
Out of 3240 hits and 24 reports for final selection, 17 were included in this review.
Caudal analgesia was found to be better in both early (RR = 0.81 [0.66, 0.99], P=0.04) and late (RR = 0.81 [0.69, 0.96], P=0.01) periods, but with a significant risk of motor block and urinary retention.
According to GRADE, the quality of evidence was moderate.
Although potentially superior, caudal analgesia increases the chance of motor block and urinary retention.
There are limited studies to demonstrate that the technical superiority using ultrasound translates into better clinical success with the inguinal nerve blocks.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Shanthanna, Harsha& Singh, Balpreet& Guyatt, Gordon. 2014. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Caudal Block as Compared to Noncaudal Regional Techniques for Inguinal Surgeries in Children. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-17.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-505746
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Shanthanna, Harsha…[et al.]. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Caudal Block as Compared to Noncaudal Regional Techniques for Inguinal Surgeries in Children. BioMed Research International No. 2014 (2014), pp.1-17.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-505746
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Shanthanna, Harsha& Singh, Balpreet& Guyatt, Gordon. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Caudal Block as Compared to Noncaudal Regional Techniques for Inguinal Surgeries in Children. BioMed Research International. 2014. Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-17.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-505746
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-505746
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر