![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained by different methods of assessment “Subjective and Objective” in normal and different forms of hearing loss
العناوين الأخرى
تقييم و مقارنة حدة السمع بالطرق الاختيارية و التسجيلية في قوة السمع الطبيعي و الأمراض المختلفة من السمع
المؤلفون المشاركون
Bakr, Muhammad Salamah
al-Attar, Amal Muhammad Husayn
Sad, Muhammad Mustafa
al-Sharjabi, Itidal Abduh
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 29، العدد 1 (31 يناير/كانون الثاني 2005)، ص ص. 69-78، 10ص.
الناشر
تاريخ النشر
2005-01-31
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
10
التخصصات الرئيسية
الموضوعات
الملخص EN
This study was designed to compare hearing threshold obtained by different methods of assessment, both subjective and objective, in 60 ears of normal hearing sensitivity and 120 ears with different types, degrees (up to moderately severe) and configuration of hearing loss.
Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) has been found to correlate well with behavioral threshold with certain limits.
It cannot differentiate sharply between normal and mild hearing loss with specific configurations such as low frequency and notched hearing loss.
Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAEs) response was present when hearing threshold was equal to or better than 45dBHL.
So, it cannot differentiate between ears with normal hearing from those with mild hearing loss, so presence of TEOAEs does not always reflect normal hearing sensitivity.
Distorotion product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) showed that, the response was present when hearing sensitivity was better than 55-60dB.
But could not be recorded with hearing threshold greater than 60 dBHL.
It is preferable to use a battery ofABR,TEOAEs and immittancemetry to determine hearing threshold in young children and difficult to test subjects to solve overlap between normal hearing and mild degree of hearing loss.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Sad, Muhammad Mustafa& Bakr, Muhammad Salamah& al-Attar, Amal Muhammad Husayn& al-Sharjabi, Itidal Abduh. 2005. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained by different methods of assessment “Subjective and Objective” in normal and different forms of hearing loss. Assiut Medical Journal،Vol. 29, no. 1, pp.69-78.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-52163
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Sad, Muhammad Mustafa…[et al.]. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained by different methods of assessment “Subjective and Objective” in normal and different forms of hearing loss. Assiut Medical Journal Vol. 29, no. 1(Jan. 2005), pp.69-78.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-52163
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Sad, Muhammad Mustafa& Bakr, Muhammad Salamah& al-Attar, Amal Muhammad Husayn& al-Sharjabi, Itidal Abduh. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained by different methods of assessment “Subjective and Objective” in normal and different forms of hearing loss. Assiut Medical Journal. 2005. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp.69-78.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-52163
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references : p. 77-78
رقم السجل
BIM-52163
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)