Randomized clinical trial comparing two different techniques of local anesthesia (subcutaneous versus subcutaneous and deep infiltration) for postoperative pain in patients undergoing open appendecectomy
المؤلفون المشاركون
Hidaya, Muhammad S.
Izzat, Husayn M.
Fayid, M. Mahir H.
Salamah, A. F.
Hilmi, Ahmad H.
Rifat, Ahmad I.
المصدر
Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology
العدد
المجلد 45، العدد 1 (30 إبريل/نيسان 2015)، ص ص. 177-182، 6ص.
الناشر
الجمعية المصرية لعلم الطفيليات
تاريخ النشر
2015-04-30
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
6
التخصصات الرئيسية
الموضوعات
الملخص EN
This study compared the postoperative analgesic effect of local anesthetic (LA) injected subcutaneous (SC) alone versus local anesthetic injected both SC and deep in patients undergoing open appendecectomy operations.
Sixty patients ASA class I- II undergoing open appendecectomy for presumed acute appendicitis will be randomly assigned into three groups.
After routine monitoring, anesthesia induction was performed with propofol, fentanyl and, cis-atracurium; later, maintenance was continued with isoflurane.
GA received local infiltration of the skin prior to incision with bupivacaine 0.25% (10ml), GB received received half the bupivacaine infiltrated into the skin and other half deep-to external oblique prior to incision to create a local nerve field blockade & GC received half dose of saline subcutaneous & half deep to external oblique muscle prior to incision.
Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analogue score (VAS) at 1, 4, 8, & 24 hours post extubation.
Pethidine 1 mg/kg was given if VAS is ≥4.
All patients in GA (SC) and Control required postoperative analgesics, compared to only 60% of the patients in GB (SC+ deep).
Time for the first analgesic requirement was prolonged in GB compared to other groups (P<0.01).
VAS scores were significantly lower in patients of GB in the first 8 hr.
postoperative compared to GA &GC (P < 0.01).
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Rifat, Ahmad I.& Hidaya, Muhammad S.& Izzat, Husayn M.& Fayid, M. Mahir H.& Salamah, A. F.& Hilmi, Ahmad H.. 2015. Randomized clinical trial comparing two different techniques of local anesthesia (subcutaneous versus subcutaneous and deep infiltration) for postoperative pain in patients undergoing open appendecectomy. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology،Vol. 45, no. 1, pp.177-182.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-563675
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Rifat, Ahmad I.…[et al.]. Randomized clinical trial comparing two different techniques of local anesthesia (subcutaneous versus subcutaneous and deep infiltration) for postoperative pain in patients undergoing open appendecectomy. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology Vol. 45, no. 1 (Apr. 2015), pp.177-182.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-563675
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Rifat, Ahmad I.& Hidaya, Muhammad S.& Izzat, Husayn M.& Fayid, M. Mahir H.& Salamah, A. F.& Hilmi, Ahmad H.. Randomized clinical trial comparing two different techniques of local anesthesia (subcutaneous versus subcutaneous and deep infiltration) for postoperative pain in patients undergoing open appendecectomy. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology. 2015. Vol. 45, no. 1, pp.177-182.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-563675
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references : p. 181-182
رقم السجل
BIM-563675
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر