![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Single-injection penile block versus caudal block in penile pediatric surgery
المؤلفون المشاركون
Ashry, Inas M.
Bassat, Bassat E.
المصدر
Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology
العدد
المجلد 7، العدد 3 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2014)، ص ص. 428-433، 6ص.
الناشر
جامعة عين شمس كلية الطب قسم التخدير
تاريخ النشر
2014-12-31
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
6
التخصصات الرئيسية
الموضوعات
الملخص EN
Background Penile block is recommended for analgesia during and after surface operation on the penis, for example circumcision, phimosis, meatal stenosis, and hypospadias repair.
Objective To evaluate the effect of penile block versus caudal block using bupivacaine on the quality of analgesia, and the surgeon’s and parents’ satisfaction after penile pediatric surgery.
Patients and methods This study was conducted on 80 healthy boys aged 1–7 years, of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II health classes, scheduled for hypospadias repair, circumcision and meatal stenosis under general anesthesia.
The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: group P (penile block, 0.25% bupivacaine, 0.5 mg / kg; n = 40) and group C (caudal block, 0.25% bupivacaine, 0.5 mg / kg; n = 40).
The heart rate (HR), the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and oxygen saturation were measured perioperatively.
Postoperative pain evaluated by the FLACC pain scale of fi ve categories, (F) Face, (L) Leg, (A) Activity, (C) Cry, (C) Consolability, was assessed on admission to and on discharge from the PACU and 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h postoperatively.
Also, the time to fi rst rescue analgesic request and doses of analgesic requirements were recorded.
The surgeon’s and parents’ satisfaction were evaluated on the fi rst day of the operation using a fi ve-point verbal score.
Results In group P, there was no signifi cant decrease in the HR and the MAP compared with the baseline, but in group C, there was a signifi cant decrease in HR and MAP compared with the baseline.
FLACC pain scores were signifi cantly lower in group P compared with group C (P < 0.05).
Also, the time to fi rst need for analgesia was signifi cantly (P < 0.05) lower in group P compared with group C.
The total analgesic requirement was also signifi cantly lower (P < 0.05) in group P compared with group C.
Conclusion Single-injection penile block is superior to caudal epidural block for relief of postoperative pain in children undergoing penile surgery with more satisfaction to the surgeon and the parents, without signifi cant increase in the rate of adverse events.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Ashry, Inas M.& Bassat, Bassat E.. 2014. Single-injection penile block versus caudal block in penile pediatric surgery. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology،Vol. 7, no. 3, pp.428-433.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-651839
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Ashry, Inas M.& Bassat, Bassat E.. Single-injection penile block versus caudal block in penile pediatric surgery. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology Vol. 7, no. 3 (Sep. / Dec. 2014), pp.428-433.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-651839
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Ashry, Inas M.& Bassat, Bassat E.. Single-injection penile block versus caudal block in penile pediatric surgery. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology. 2014. Vol. 7, no. 3, pp.428-433.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-651839
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references : p.432-433
رقم السجل
BIM-651839
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)