تعقبات النحاس لأبي حاتم السجستاني في إعراب القرآن

الملخص EN

This paper deals with Abu Jaafar AI-Nahhas’s position towards Abu HatemSijistani in his book The Interpetation of the Koran”.

His reflections were compiled and classified into two categories: the first: the grammatical issues and the second is the morphological issues.

Each issue has been given a special title of its own.

Then Abu Ja'far Al-Nahhas’s text, that includes his critique of Abu Hatem, has been illustrated followed by a study of this critique from the viewpoint of other grammarians.

Later I stated my view in the matter in question.

Most of these stances and reflections have been strongly correlated with the Koranic readings, in terms of the accuracy of reading in some, and the search for justifications for their permissibility or not.

Later, an examination the methodology of these critiques has been included, where Abu Jaafar’sstyle has been adopted.They have been numerous and included mistakes, errors, and even denial of the speech depending on his special references that included the scholars of his time and his briefing of their works! All has been based on scientific grounds, most notably the evidence ofreports,narrations, and consensus, the conclusions reached by the Basris.

Though thecritiques have been associated with the readings of the positions of two scholars, which were mostly mixed, Abu Hatem was more severe in dealing with some of the readings; he denied,refuted, and ruled out some of the readings.

Abu HatemAl-Nahhas, on the other hand, was more inclined to accept the reading of it for the most part.