Ketamine-propofol sedation versus propofol-pethidine sedation for minor plastic surgery procedures
المؤلف
المصدر
Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology
العدد
المجلد 9، العدد 2 (30 يونيو/حزيران 2016)، ص ص. 245-249، 5ص.
الناشر
جامعة عين شمس كلية الطب قسم التخدير
تاريخ النشر
2016-06-30
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
5
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Objective The aim of the study was to compare the effi cacy of ketamine–propofol (KP) sedation versus propofol-pethidine (PP) sedation for minor plastic surgery procedures.
Patients and methods This prospective study was conducted by randomizat ion of 60 patients undergoing minor plastic surgery procedures.
Patients were randomly divided into two groups by means of the sealed envelope technique: the KP group (n = 30) and the PP group (n = 30).
In the former group, patients received induction with a bolus dose of ketamine 1 mg/kg dissolved in 10 ml saline, and in the latter group patients received induction with a bolus dose of 1 mg/kg pethidine dissolved in 10 ml saline intravenously.
In both groups propofol was given as 1 mg/kg propofol, intravenous, bolus dose, additional doses of propofol 30 mg IV were given if sedation score was less than 4 in both groups followed by 5 mg/kg/h intravenous infusion.
Sedation score, pain score, mean arterial blood pressure, total dose of propofol, conversion to general anesthesia, postoperative patient satisfaction score, and incidence of postoperative complications such as hypotension, oxygen desaturation, and vomiting were all recorded.
Results Intraoperative pain scores, mean arterial blood pressure, and postoperative patient satisfaction scores were signifi cantly higher in the PP group compared with the KP group.
The sedation score was signifi cantly higher in the KP group than in the PP group.
Total dose of propofol was signifi cantly lower in the KP group than in the PP group.
There was no signifi cant difference between the study groups regarding conversion to general anesthesia.
Reco very time was signifi cantly longer in the KP group compared with the PP group.
There were signifi cant differences in the incidence of complications such as oxygen desaturation and postoperative vomiting among the study groups.
Conclusion The KP combination provides an attractive combination for procedural sedation compared with PP combination in terms of better sedation, hemodynamic stability, and lower incidence of complications.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Shukri, Huda. 2016. Ketamine-propofol sedation versus propofol-pethidine sedation for minor plastic surgery procedures. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology،Vol. 9, no. 2, pp.245-249.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-688344
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Shukri, Huda. Ketamine-propofol sedation versus propofol-pethidine sedation for minor plastic surgery procedures. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology Vol. 9, no. 2 (Apr. / Jun. 2016), pp.245-249.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-688344
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Shukri, Huda. Ketamine-propofol sedation versus propofol-pethidine sedation for minor plastic surgery procedures. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology. 2016. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp.245-249.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-688344
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references : p. 249
رقم السجل
BIM-688344
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر