الموقف التركي من حربي غزة 2012-2014

الملخص EN

The study came as a result of profound analytical reading of theTurkish policies and attitudes regarding the wars in 2012, 2014 attacks by“Israel” against Gaza Strip, despite the fact of non- declared goals, and the positions of the Arab regional powers realize that the basic and main aim is to tame the resistance, and tame Gaza Strip which is considered an an obstacle in passing any political projects consistent and with the results of the currentArab movements , and political events and sequences of violent tremors in the region significantly affected all regional positions, including the Turkish position, which was slowly escalated since the victory of the Justice and Development Party in 2002 and thehis bias tothe Palestinian question on its relations with “Israel”, as an access card to the middle east after West closingtheir doors to Turkey.

generally speaking.

These policies of the Turkish government continues to maintain the same methodology and approach in the wars in 2012.

2014, but this position has witnessed decline in the 2014 war, as a result of the Syrian crisis, which neutralized the Syrian regime and Hezbollah.

The study found many of the most important result, the transformative phenomenon in the Turkish attitudes and policies towards the Palestinian cause, is only a Turkish show off on the political level, in addition to the humanitarian aid and popular movements to stand by the Palestinian people.

The Arab movements and the changes happening in the region, particularly in Syria and the overthrow of Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi, impacted the Turkish positions and policies and made Turkey stop to recalculate its rushy positions regarding the situation in the region, fearing that this might impact the internal situation in Turkey given the mounting voice of Turkish opposition in Turkey.

Turkey merely played the role of a mediator, without the rush to tose the Israel due to the political, economical, cultural and military agreements with Israel .

Moreover, the weak Turkish position, and reluctance by decline and weakness of Iran and Syria and Hezbollah