A pilot study comparing hysteroscopic adhesiolysis by conventional resectoscope versus mini-resectoscope
المؤلفون المشاركون
Roy, Kallol Kumar
Lingampally, Archana
Kansal, Yamini
Bharti, Juhi
Vanamail, Perumal
Singhal, Seema
Meena, Jyoti
Kumar, Sunesh
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 32، العدد 6 (30 نوفمبر/تشرين الثاني 2017)، ص ص. 492-498، 7ص.
الناشر
المجلس العماني للاختصاصات الطبية
تاريخ النشر
2017-11-30
دولة النشر
سلطنة عمان
عدد الصفحات
7
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Objectives: To compare the feasibility and efficacy of the mini-resectoscope with the conventional resectoscope in terms of the operative, menstrual, and reproductive outcome in hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in infertile women.
Methods: We conducted a parallel prospective randomized study at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
A total of 60 patients underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using either conventional resectoscope (n = 30) or mini-resectoscope (n = 30).
The primary outcome measures were pregnancy-related indicators.
Secondary outcome measures were the operative parameters (cervical dilatation time, operation time, postoperative pain scores, fluid deficit, and preoperative and postoperative sodium levels), second-look hysteroscopy findings, and improvement in the menstrual pattern after surgery.
Results: Cervical dilatation time and pain score 30 minutes after the procedure were significantly lower in the mini-resectoscope group.
Out of the total 21 cases with hypomenorrhea, 12 cases (57.1%) started having normal menstrual flow postsurgery.
All amenorrheic patients resumed menstruation after surgery.
However, nine cases continued to have hypomenorrhea.
Over long-term followup, 16 patients out of 60 had conceived (seven in the conventional resectoscope group and nine in the mini-resectoscope group).
There were three ongoing pregnancies, three abortions, one ectopic pregnancy, and nine term pregnancies.
The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: The use of mini-resectoscope for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is associated with reduced operative morbidity.
Use of the mini-resectoscope is an effective and safe alternative to the conventional system.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Roy, Kallol Kumar& Lingampally, Archana& Kansal, Yamini& Bharti, Juhi& Kumar, Sunesh& Vanamail, Perumal…[et al.]. 2017. A pilot study comparing hysteroscopic adhesiolysis by conventional resectoscope versus mini-resectoscope. Oman Medical Journal،Vol. 32, no. 6, pp.492-498.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-800141
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Roy, Kallol Kumar…[et al.]. A pilot study comparing hysteroscopic adhesiolysis by conventional resectoscope versus mini-resectoscope. Oman Medical Journal Vol. 32, no. 6 (Nov. 2017), pp.492-498.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-800141
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Roy, Kallol Kumar& Lingampally, Archana& Kansal, Yamini& Bharti, Juhi& Kumar, Sunesh& Vanamail, Perumal…[et al.]. A pilot study comparing hysteroscopic adhesiolysis by conventional resectoscope versus mini-resectoscope. Oman Medical Journal. 2017. Vol. 32, no. 6, pp.492-498.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-800141
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references : p. 498
رقم السجل
BIM-800141
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر