مرويات الإمام عبد الرزاق الصنعاني في صحيح مسلم : دراسة نقدية تطبيقية

الملخص EN

The study examines the status of Imam Abdel Razzaq Al Sanaani and his narrations in Saheeh Muslim as he was one of the abundant narrators, some pitfalls taken to imam Abdel Razzaq Al Sanaani are: Shiite, Ikhtelat and Tadlis.

The importance of this study stems from the fact that Imam Abdel Razzaq Al Sanaani was one narrators who answered the arguments of the reason why Muslim edited his narrations despite the fact he was one of his critics.

The researchers employed the inferential analytical and critical design in the study by collecting all Abdel Razzaq Al Sanaani narrations in Saheeh Muslim and how Imam Muslim edited them The study concluded with several results, including Some pitfalls were taken to Imam Abdel Razzaq Al Sanaani such as being Shiite and prone to Iktelat.

Imam Muslim took these pitfalls carefully as he did not take any of Imam Abdel Razzaq Al Sanaani narrations after Iktelat.

He did not edit to AbdelRazzaq narrations taken from Jaafar Al Daabi, who was known as being Shiite, noting at the same time that AbdelRazzaq Shiite was of love for the Prophet Mohammad family, his preference to them on the expense of Umayyad The number of Imam Abdel Razzaq Al Sanaani and his narrations in Saheeh Muslim were three hundred and ninety nine Hadith, thirty six Hadith were edited in the original ones, three hundred and twenty five in the additions, while thirty Hadith were in the evidences The researchers recommend to care about critical studies which show the professionality of Hadith’s Imams, also to care about studying Imam Abdel Razzaq Al Sanaani’s Narrations in Saheeh Muslim by a detailed scientific thesis.