![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
The pragmatics of political accusations in Obama-Romney first presidential debate 2012
العناوين الأخرى
تداولية الاتهامات السياسية في المناظرة الرئاسية الأولى بين أوباما و رومني في سنة 2012
المؤلفون المشاركون
al-Juwaid, Walid Rida Hammudi
al-Hindawi, Farid Hamid
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 1، العدد 36 (30 سبتمبر/أيلول 2018)، ص ص. 9-30، 22ص.
الناشر
تاريخ النشر
2018-09-30
دولة النشر
العراق
عدد الصفحات
22
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
This study tackles political accusation in the context of Obama- Romney first presidential debate 2012.
The participants in the political discourse exploit various pragmatic strategies in order to take over their opponents' arguments.
Political accusation, here, is dealt with as a process rather than a product for the operationality of analyzing the data under study.
It is political on the principal ground that it tackles political issues.
Accordingly, this study sets itself the task of investigating how political accusation takes place in the aforementioned context.
It aims, first, at identifying the pragmatic structure of political accusation, second, detecting the pragmatic strategies used by the presidential candidates in the data under scrutiny and, third, tracing whether a candidate's pragmatic strategies are different or not from the other candidate's pragmatic strategies as far as political accusation is concerned.
The hypotheses intended to be tested by this study are: first, the pragmatic structure of political accusation is composed of two stages: attack stage and defense stage, second, both stages are realized via various pragmatic strategies and, third, the use of pragmatic strategies are different from one candidate to another.
For achieving the aims of the study and testing its hypotheses, an eclectic model is developed on the basis of various other models which are offered by other studies.
This model is used to pragmatically analyze the data of the study.
Besides, a statistic analysis by means of the percentage equation is conducted to quantitatively support the findings of the pragmatic analysis.
The analyses of the data under study reveal that the hypotheses adopted are verified
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
al-Hindawi, Farid Hamid & al-Juwaid, Walid Rida Hammudi. 2018. The pragmatics of political accusations in Obama-Romney first presidential debate 2012. Adab al-Kufa،Vol. 1, no. 36, pp.9-30.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-838498
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
al-Hindawi, Farid Hamid & al-Juwaid, Walid Rida Hammudi. The pragmatics of political accusations in Obama-Romney first presidential debate 2012. Adab al-Kufa Vol. 1, no. 36 (2018), pp.9-30.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-838498
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
al-Hindawi, Farid Hamid & al-Juwaid, Walid Rida Hammudi. The pragmatics of political accusations in Obama-Romney first presidential debate 2012. Adab al-Kufa. 2018. Vol. 1, no. 36, pp.9-30.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-838498
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references : p. 28-30
رقم السجل
BIM-838498
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)