معالم التجديد الأصولي عند الدكتور حسن الترابي : دراسة تحليلية مقارنة

الملخص EN

Renewing the fundamentals of Islamic jurisprudence is closely related to the problem of renewing Islamic heritage in general and Islamic jurisprudence in particular.

Successive calls for renewing it have been launched to keep pace with respect to contemporary developments.

Dr.

Hassan Al-Turabi advocates renewing fundamentals of Islamic jurisprudence although attitudes of some scholars, writers and thinkers agree to differ concerning this notion.

This comparative analytical study, then, intends to clarify his renewal project and its important features besides to comparing it with other renewal projects in respect of Methodology and objectivity.

Concerning the former, Turabi noticed a number of systematic criticisms about fundamentalist heritage including the predominance of interpretive fundamentals and individual religiosity on general issues, the predominance of abstraction and theoretical debate on realism, and the relativity of jurisprudence and its history.

The latter includes the fundamentalist renewal with regard to Dr.

Turabi's notion did not stop at the methodological criticism, but it also considers a number of cognitive issues that concern fundamentalist jurisprudence evidence, especially measurement, accompanying and consensus.

He proposes to expand it so as to be wide enough for all modern developments instead of limiting its functions.