![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
The management of achalasia in Sudan : Heller’s myotomy versus pneumatic dilatation
العناوين الأخرى
تدبير حالة تعذر ارتخاء عضلات أسفل المريء (الأكالازيا) في السودان: مقارنة استخدام نضع العضل بطريقة هيلير مع إجراء التوسيع بالبالون الهوائي
المؤلفون المشاركون
Abbas, Amin Muhammad
Mahdi, Sayf al-Din Ibrahim
al-Nadir, Jalal Abd al-Majid
Abd Allah, Muhammad al-Makki Ahmad
المصدر
Journal of the Arab Board of Health Specializations
العدد
المجلد 20، العدد 1 (31 مارس/آذار 2019)، ص ص. 25-31، 7ص.
الناشر
المجلس العربي للاختصاصات الصحية
تاريخ النشر
2019-03-31
دولة النشر
سوريا
عدد الصفحات
7
التخصصات الرئيسية
الموضوعات
الملخص EN
Objective: Heller’s myotomy and pneumatic balloon dilatations (PBD) are the two principal modalities for treatment of achalasia in Sudan.
The choice between the two former modalities as the initial treatment of achalasia is controversial.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of Heller’s myotomy compared to pneumatic balloon dilatations (PBD) as initial treatment of achalasia.
Methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional, non-randomized hospital-based study.
Sixty patients with achalasia were studied from January 2006 to December 2012.
Patients were subdivided according to treatment they received, either by pneumatic balloon dilatation (n=30) or open Heller’s myotomy combined with anti-reflux surgery (n=30).
Patients in both groups were referred directly by physician according to their preference.
Data was collected as regard clinical presentation, management and outcome.
Patients were followed for 2 years.
Results: The mean age was 38.7±14.16 and 41.6±16.6 years, with equal male to female ratio in the surgical and dilatation group respectively.
Dysphagia, regurgitation and weight loss were the most presenting symptoms in all patients.
Symptoms score before treatment was comparable 11.7±2.33 versus 11.2±2.90 for surgery and dilatation group respectively.
Following treatment, dysphagia was completely relieved in 23 (76.7%) of surgical patients compared to 10 (33.3%) of patients who underwent dilatation (p=0.001).
Surgical patients had significant relief of regurgitation (n=28, 93.3%) versus (n=15, 50%) of dilatation group (p=0.02).
Dilatation group showed a significant more rapid response to treatment, earlier return to normal activity and a shorter hospital stay than surgical group.
The overall outcome of treatment was excellent in 76.7% vs.
26.7%, good in 16.7% vs.
33.3% and poor in 6.7 %vs.
40% for surgical and dilatation group respectively, (p=0.000).
Conclusions: Open Heller’s myotomy with fundoplication was more effective, have long durability and better outcome than pneumatic balloon dilatations (PBD) as initial treatment of achalasia.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
al-Nadir, Jalal Abd al-Majid& Mahdi, Sayf al-Din Ibrahim& Abbas, Amin Muhammad& Abd Allah, Muhammad al-Makki Ahmad. 2019. The management of achalasia in Sudan : Heller’s myotomy versus pneumatic dilatation. Journal of the Arab Board of Health Specializations،Vol. 20, no. 1, pp.25-31.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-895333
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
al-Nadir, Jalal Abd al-Majid…[et al.]. The management of achalasia in Sudan : Heller’s myotomy versus pneumatic dilatation. Journal of the Arab Board of Health Specializations Vol. 20, no. 1 (2019), pp.25-31.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-895333
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
al-Nadir, Jalal Abd al-Majid& Mahdi, Sayf al-Din Ibrahim& Abbas, Amin Muhammad& Abd Allah, Muhammad al-Makki Ahmad. The management of achalasia in Sudan : Heller’s myotomy versus pneumatic dilatation. Journal of the Arab Board of Health Specializations. 2019. Vol. 20, no. 1, pp.25-31.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-895333
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references : p. 30-31
رقم السجل
BIM-895333
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
![](/images/ebook-kashef.png)
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر
![](/images/kashef-image.png)