مسألة الأرزاق عند المتكلمين: عرض ونقد

الملخص EN

The issue of livelihood of the contractual issues that have a close relationship with faith and destiny, which is linked to the doctrine of the Muslim and certainty, but some teams and doctrines introduced in the issue many problems, Vakaddrah claimed that God did not divide livelihoods but on the face, which ruled its inheritance maturity, and protracted postponed judgment where the Day of Resurrection, and this practically denied any practical role of the heavenly message, and algebraic say the livelihood measure of God specific to the individual does not increase nor subtracts nothing to do with him because of the taxpayer, and it was this concept a devastating impact in the life of the nation, and Mu'tazila Tosoawa in the matter, and then they decided that a living is no benefit from it, it is the king, and it increases demand and decreases Baltawana, and that no man does not have a baby, and that the utilization of sustenance means Alaltmaz, a perception thing with lust, and claimed that the request for a livelihood ugly and it may detract from their trust, and then dealt with the matter and are consistent with sound doctrine which stems from the Koran and the Sunnah, which proved that a living God's hands whether it is halal or haram and that God is alive and all the people, and this was treated by the Salafi model that represents the Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah.