الأدوات المركبة في العربية : مقاربة وظيفية لبعض النماذج

الملخص EN

Scholars have faced some difficulties in categorizing certain tools semantically and syntactically.

Because, apparently, they do not distinguish the difference between what is synchrony and diachrony.

In this research, we will attempt to study some models (« lasiyama » and some adverbs) with the problematic situation reflected by grammar books and dictionaries (general and specialized) that are full of interpretations and controversies.

These types of composite units are, in time, independent units (both grammatically and semantically); they may be originally names, verbs, adverbs or articles.

In its union, the functions and characteristics of some of them changed and appeared in the form of a significant « new » unit / word that may be wholly or partly independent of its constituent assets.

(For example, innama, lakinnama, ta:lama, aynama, raythama, baynama, haythuma, roubbama, qallama, baadama, koullama, lasiyama, etc).

لاسيما مثلما, ريثما, دونما, عندما, حينما, بينما, بعدما We have adapted this new category of language units with a concept of French functional linguistics, A.

Martini, the “synthème” concept which is a new unit of semantics historically formed from two or more units, independent functions.

- لاسيما مثلما, ريثما, دونما, عندما, حينما, بينما, بعدما