دراسة تقويمية للجنة الامتحانات المركزية بالكلية الجامعية للعلوم التطبيقية من وجهة نظر أعضاء الهيئة التدريسية فيها

Abstract EN

The present study aimed at identifying the assessment grades of the Central Examination Committee at the University College of Applied Sciences (UCAS) from its academics’ point of view.

To fulfill the purpose of the study, the researchers used the descriptive analytical approach.

The study sample included (54) academics at UCAS, who were selected randomly from the population of the study.

A 46 itemquestionnaire was designed in this regard; distributed over three domains: (The duties of the central examination committee at UCAS, the attitudes of the academics towards the examination committee, and improving the central examination committee from the academics’ point of view at UCAS).

The study found out that: -There are statistically significant differences at (α ≥0 .05) in the responses of the study sample regarding (the duties of the central examination committee at UCAS) due to the years of experience variable.

- There are no statistically significant differences at (α ≥0 .05) in the responses of the study sample regarding (the attitudes of the academics towards the examination committee, and the performance improvement of the watchers at UCAS) due to the years of experience variable.

- There are no statistically significant differences at (α ≥0 .05) in the responses of the study sample regarding (the duties of the examination committee, the academics’ attitudes towards the examination committee, and the performance improvement of the invigilators at UCAS) due to the academic qualification variable.