النظام القانوني لجرائم الجلسات : دراسة مقارنة
Other Title(s)
The legal system of hearing crimes : comparative study
Le régime juridique des infractions d’audience : étude comparative
Author
Source
المجلة الأكاديمية للبحث القانوني
Issue
Vol. 7, Issue 2 (31 Dec. 2016), pp.273-299, 27 p.
Publisher
Université Abderrahmane Mira-Bejaia Faculté de Droit et des Sciences Politiques
Publication Date
2016-12-31
Country of Publication
Algeria
No. of Pages
27
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
A crime of hearings (preliminary hearing) is the general sense of this term is any acts which happen within hearings and during look into the proceeding.
It is either merely acts of confusion or breach (violated) but it is not like the crime accomplishment ،but if it is like the crime ،it will be either crime ،offense or violation in two situations will disturb in the system which must be provide in the court.
For that reason ،the lawmaker (lawgiver) of the court granted exceptional rules .These rules are differences according to the type of the court whether it was criminal or civilization court ،and also are differences if the crime was happening from a formal people or from a lawyer.
The rules which are granted to the criminal court by lawmaker for criminal of hearing.
It was wider then civilization court.
The procedures which are taken by the court are used to face the crime which happens from the lawyer than from that happen from the formal people whether are quarrelers or one of the attendants.
The exceptional rules which are granted by lawmaker in order to face the crimes represented by unrestricted the court for rules which must be regarded if the crime is not from the criminals hearings.
The criminals hearings are not restricted in qualitative ،individual or locative specialization when the procedures of legality are taken for these crimes ،and also when the court faced those crimes it is gathering between the rules of accusation and the rules of judgments and sometimes investigating in the crime as well as the special rules which prevented and reacted the judges from looking to the case and which are not operated in these crime
Abstract FRE
Les infractions d’audience sont celles qui peuvent avoir lieu dans les salles d’audience pendant le déroulement d’un procès.
Elles peuvent être de simples troubles d’audience ou de véritables crimes, délits ou contravention.
Elles sont de toutes manières considérées comme portant atteinte à l’ordre d’une audience.
Dans ce cadre, le législateur confère au tribunal des prérogatives exceptionnelles et différenciées selon la constitution du tribunal (pénale ou civile), différentes également au regard de leurs auteurs (émanant de l’assistance ou d’avocats).
Les attributions conférées à la cour criminelle dans ce cadre sont nettement plus larges que celles attribuées à la juridiction civile.
De telles prérogatives sont prises sans prendre en compte les règles de compétence personnelle ou matérielle et, le tribunal cumul entre l’accusation et le procès.
Il est à noter également que les règles d’empêchement et de récusation des juges ne sont pas prises en compte dans ce cadre
American Psychological Association (APA)
زيدان، محمد جياد. 2016. النظام القانوني لجرائم الجلسات : دراسة مقارنة. المجلة الأكاديمية للبحث القانوني،مج. 7، ع. 2، ص ص. 273-299.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-863301
Modern Language Association (MLA)
زيدان، محمد جياد. النظام القانوني لجرائم الجلسات : دراسة مقارنة. المجلة الأكاديمية للبحث القانوني مج. 7، ع. 2 (2016)، ص ص. 273-299.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-863301
American Medical Association (AMA)
زيدان، محمد جياد. النظام القانوني لجرائم الجلسات : دراسة مقارنة. المجلة الأكاديمية للبحث القانوني. 2016. مج. 7، ع. 2، ص ص. 273-299.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-863301
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن هوامش : ص. 296-299
Record ID
BIM-863301