المغالطات الحجاجية في قصة يوسف الصديق عليه السلام

Abstract EN

This study seeks to uncover the negative face of the argumentation in the story of Yusuf Al-Siddiq peace be upon him, describing the ways that the interlocutor adopted in order to lure the addressee willingly or fearfully.

And because the methods of disinformation vary between explicitness and implicitness in the story, the study aims to highlight the most important linguistic and non-linguistic capabilities adopted by the addressorin order to mislead the recipient.

The study thus reveals the implied energy of the argumentation, which is required or implied.

The study attempts to answer the following question: How does the interlocutor adopt the argumentative fallacies in his dialogue in order to achieve the desired result?