الفرق الكلامية الإسلامية و ظاهرة التطرف الديني

Abstract EN

When religion becomes a criterion of discrimination and antagonism, it undoubtedly has been employed for non-religious purpose.

This is what we see with Islamic sects, so concepts of faith, immorality and infidelity have become used to denote the offender and the opponent in the Islamic circle.

It is mainly political concepts that have worn the dress of religion.

Perhaps this position is justified by these teams at the time, that the epistemic stage that was the characteristic of the middle thought where the religious sayings were dominant, instead of the sayings of modern political thought, made these teams see the political dispute as a religious ideological disagreement, which made the opponent adversary in Religion, and then his treatment is with religious limits.

However, the continuation of this thought today among many contemporary religious groups - which is surprising - calls for a review in many categories of modern and contemporary religious thought.

For the simple reason that it makes old religious thought an absolute thought that transcends the history that it produced.