من القابلية للتكذيب إلى الباراديغم: دراسة مقارنة بين كارل بوبر وتوماس كوهن

Abstract EN

Both of ‘K.

Popper’ and ‘T.

Kuhn are played a big role in philosophy of science of twenty century what makes their studies important, which leads us to make a comparison between them.

in spite of likeness between ‘popper’ and ‘Kuhn’ in some sides, both of them are interested with problems of knowledge and their growth, and so, science and its evolution, but this nearness is general, because when they see in details, we’ll find that the difference is immense between them, the proof that ‘popper’ in his distinction of science is adopt a criterion of falsifiability and falsification, moreo’ver, he treats scientific knowledge from logical point view, but Kuhn employs the puzzle-solution as creterium of science, and he takes the history as a back-ground important in his treatment and analysis of science.

finally, we conclue that the diffrence is the most occurrence between popper and Khun.