الرقابة القضائية على التعديلات الدستورية

Abstract EN

Contemporary constitutional jurisprudence is almost unanimous in that it is not intended to control the constitutionality of laws.

It is limited to monitoring the compatibility of ordinary legislation issued by the legislative authority with constitutional provisions.

Moreover ‘the concept of censorship generally extends to the control of the constitutionality of amendments ‘Constitutional.

On this basis ‘jurisprudence began to be considered in the constitutional documents on the basis of the purpose of establishing this type of censorship.

Of course ‘the discussion here is related to the constitutional systems ‘which did not explicitly stipulate that this kind of censorship be included in the constitution.

In the constitutional document as a legal basis for such censorship ‘considering that the constitutional founder has made certain subjects as a limitation on the power of constitutional amendment ‘perhaps not more closely related to the issue of constitutional public order.

The general principles of constitutional value have also been recognized as a legal basis for the control of constitutional amendments.

In this case ‘the constitutional judge is considered to be a participant in the constitutional review process along with the rest of the other authorities representing the constitutional amendment authority.