البلاغة بين الإرسال و التلقي في تفكير الجاحظ البلاغي

Abstract EN

: If the modern Arab scholars were collaborating to absorb the first Arabic critical rhetorical texts, what would they have done to the qualities of the readers and scholars, and even their conquerors in the science of the same place, only if they were based on the memorization of a number of core issues, mainly the Arab critical and rhetorical studies, The latter came to light the ink a lot of modern Arabic / contemporary criticism, so some of them plunge into the ambiguity of heavy issues, and in some of the contract embodied in the old Arab rhetorical lesson, reading and scrutiny, with a critical and prudent thought, And the most recent of which is the passing of the books on the necessary issues and the core issues.

So may hold up what is hidden from its predecessors.

However, this absorbing is based on the digging and turning over by the modern Arab critics which is mainly a study or a reading of the vast heritage Arabic.

May appear in the reader's intellectual a differences of ideological and intellectual critics in the most places that are nowadays still the subject of spacing and alignment, and perhaps one of the most prominent issues that raised the views of our critics Arab innovators; the issue of Arab rhetoric between the two ribs correspondence and reception.

From what was said, this research aims at uncovering one of the most critical rhetorical issues in which modern Arab criticism has witnessed.

This is the issue of changing the Arab rhetoric between transmission and reception.

However, we will stand critically careful and safe, to discover the main issue in the founder of Arabic rhetoric the Author or the “Al-Bayan Al-Arabi and Taibeen and “Al-Hayaouan”; Al-Jahiz (255).

So, how is the rhetorical, communicative process image reflected in the rhetorical writings of Al-Jahz? And why did this early pictorial detachment leave most of the Arab critics and philosophers who came after him and turned to him?