الخروج من الخلاف في الفقه الإسلامي

Abstract EN

There are many studies that dealt with differences in jurisprudential rulings.

Muslims have known this type of disagreement since the time of the Prophet, may God's prayers and peace be upon him and those who came after him.

This difference may be a blessing as it may be a curse.

If this difference is a difference of mercy then it is part of the praiseworthy disagreement.

A resentment is considered part of the blameworthy disagreement, and the Companions had differences of mercy, not a difference of division.

And the imams of the sects used to say always in one tongue that we have seen a right that can be wrong, and someone else has seen a mistake that can be correct.

However, after that, people appeared who did not see anything but their opinion, but said they are men, and we are men.

Other is not taken, even if it is strong.

Therefore, it is permissible to depart from the doctrine if there is strong evidence in another doctrine.

In our research, we dealt with exiting the disagreement as a basic principle in the jurisprudential rules, in order to bring closer the jurisprudential opinions between them, as it works to remove the disagreement and defeat the discord, but we find that this original has not been studied and researched, so we liked to address it in general terms