Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
Joint Authors
Bathija, Heli
Meirik, O.
Banks, E.
Farley, T.
Akande, O.
Ali, M.
Source
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Issue
Vol. 2014, Issue 2014 (31 Dec. 2014), pp.1-3, 3 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2014-03-20
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
3
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
We commend Berg and Underland for taking on the momentous task of systematically reviewing and summarizing available data on the association between female genital mutilation (FGM) and obstetric outcomes [1, 2].
FGM is an important health and human rights issue and reliable evidence on its effects on health is critical for advocacy to encourage its abandonment.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Meirik, O.& Banks, E.& Farley, T.& Akande, O.& Bathija, Heli& Ali, M.. 2014. Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence. Obstetrics and Gynecology International،Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-3.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1046881
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Meirik, O.…[et al.]. Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence. Obstetrics and Gynecology International No. 2014 (2014), pp.1-3.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1046881
American Medical Association (AMA)
Meirik, O.& Banks, E.& Farley, T.& Akande, O.& Bathija, Heli& Ali, M.. Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2014. Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-3.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1046881
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-1046881
