Predictors of Infections following Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Review of a Large Single Center Study

Joint Authors

Jabbour, Pascal M.
Dalyai, Richard Tyler
Rosenwasser, Robert H.
Zanaty, Mario
Chitale, Rohan
Hann, Shannon
Bovenzi, Cory D.
Saigh, Mark P.
Schwartz, Eric W.
Kunkel, Emily S. I.
Efthimiadis-Budike, Alexandra S.
Chalouhi, Nohra
Starke, Robert M.
Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula I.

Source

The Scientific World Journal

Issue

Vol. 2014, Issue 2014 (31 Dec. 2014), pp.1-5, 5 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2014-10-21

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

5

Main Subjects

Medicine
Information Technology and Computer Science

Abstract EN

Introduction.

The variables that predispose to postcranioplasty infections are poorly described in the literature.

We formulated a multivariate model that predicts the risk of infection in patients undergoing cranioplasty.

Method.

Retrospective review of all patients who underwent cranioplasty following craniectomy from January, 2000, to December, 2011.

Tested predictors were age, sex, diabetic status, hypertensive status, reason for craniectomy, urgency status of craniectomy, location of cranioplasty, reoperation for hematoma, hydrocephalus postcranioplasty, and material type.

A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.

Results.

Three hundred forty-eight patients met the study criteria.

Infection rate was 26.43% (92/348).

Of these cases with infection, 56.52% (52/92) were superficial (supragaleal), 43.48% (40/92) were deep (subgaleal), and 31.52% (29/92) were present in both the supragaleal and subgaleal spaces.

The predominant pathogen was coagulase-negative staphylococcus (30.43%) followed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (22.83%) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (15.22%).

Approximately 15.22% of all cultures were polymicrobial.

Multivariate analysis revealed convex craniectomy, hemorrhagic stroke, and hydrocephalus to be associated with an increased risk of infection (OR=14.41; P<0.05, OR=4.33; P<0.05, OR=1.90; P=0.054, resp.).

Conclusion.

Many of the risk factors for infection after cranioplasty are modifiable.

Recognition and prevention of the risk factors would help decrease the infection’s rate.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Zanaty, Mario& Chalouhi, Nohra& Starke, Robert M.& Chitale, Rohan& Hann, Shannon& Bovenzi, Cory D.…[et al.]. 2014. Predictors of Infections following Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Review of a Large Single Center Study. The Scientific World Journal،Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1049308

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Zanaty, Mario…[et al.]. Predictors of Infections following Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Review of a Large Single Center Study. The Scientific World Journal No. 2014 (2014), pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1049308

American Medical Association (AMA)

Zanaty, Mario& Chalouhi, Nohra& Starke, Robert M.& Chitale, Rohan& Hann, Shannon& Bovenzi, Cory D.…[et al.]. Predictors of Infections following Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Review of a Large Single Center Study. The Scientific World Journal. 2014. Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1049308

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1049308