المقاربة التداولية للأدب-الحجاج و المفارقة في قصة "النمور في اليوم العاشر" للأديب زكريا تامر

Abstract EN

The first problem that we encounter while studying literature from a deliberative perspective is: What is the relationship of deliberative language that studies language during use with literature that is based on imagination? Where is the reference that is the basis of the trading triangle? What are the communicative relationships that speakers share in literary work? And who is the recipient to whom the literary speech is directed?.

However, as researchers, we see the necessity of enriching the deliberative method according to Paul Ricor, by looking at literature from an hermeneutic perspective (herméneutique) looking at the relationship of the castor with the recipient in literary discourse.

Given that the literary language is based on the same logical structure on which the words of reality are based Therefore, there is no objection to pragmatism from studying literature as an imaginative discourse transferred from real reality to imagined reality.

In which society crystallizes, according to Adorno's expression, in literature there are fundamental links between the writer and society, between the content of the literary work, and between the mental structures of the collective consciousness to which the writer belongs, because through the creations of the nation we can know the thinking and mentality of this nation, because its life is represented by The word in the literary work, and in this context we can recall Flaubert’s well-known saying “Madame Bovary is me”, which affirms that there are strong links between the literary work and its author, but it should be understood that the writer does not convey reality automatically.

Rather, he predicts what the reality should be