Invasive versus Non Invasive Methods Applied to Mummy Research: Will This Controversy Ever Be Solved?

Abstract EN

Advances in the application of non invasive techniques to mummified remains have shed new light on past diseases.

The virtual inspection of a corpse, which has almost completely replaced classical autopsy, has proven to be important especially when dealing with valuable museum specimens.

In spite of some very rewarding results, there are still many open questions.

Non invasive techniques provide information on hard and soft tissue pathologies and allow information to be gleaned concerning mummification practices (e.g., ancient Egyptian artificial mummification).

Nevertheless, there are other fields of mummy studies in which the results provided by non invasive techniques are not always self-explanatory.

Reliance exclusively upon virtual diagnoses can sometimes lead to inconclusive and misleading interpretations.

On the other hand, several types of investigation (e.g., histology, paleomicrobiology, and biochemistry), although minimally invasive, require direct contact with the bodies and, for this reason, are often avoided, particularly by museum curators.

Here we present an overview of the non invasive and invasive techniques currently used in mummy studies and propose an approach that might solve these conflicts.