نظام دبلن كآلية لمكافحة تسوق اللجوء و انعكاساته على حقوق اللاجئين

Abstract EN

Since most asylum seekers arriving illegally in the EU go through several countries, the question is which country should study asylum applications and protect these people, the Dublin system is the main one reference for the determination of the Member State of the Union which will be responsible for examining asylum applications, thus preventing secondary movements or so-called asylum shopping, however, the Dublin Regulation has failed to prevent secondary movements of refugees or to provide adequate safeguards to protect the rights of asylum seekers.

The consecration of the concept of "safe third country" allows Member States to send asylum seekers back to a country through which they have arrived to reach the EU, if that country complies with legal standards, including ratification and respect for international refugee and human rights instruments in general, and the existence of an effective asylum system, but the reality has shown that many refugees in Europe are sent back to countries that do not respond these criteria, in particular the criterion of security and respect for human rights.