Which Part of a Short, Global Risk Assessment, the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community, Predicts Adverse Healthcare Outcomes?

Joint Authors

O’Caoimh, Rónán
FitzGerald, Carol
Cronin, Una
Svendrovski, Anton
Gao, Yang
Healy, Elizabeth
O’Connell, Elizabeth
O’Keeffe, Gabrielle
O’Herlihy, Eileen
Weathers, Elizabeth
Cornally, Nicola
Orfila, Francesc
Clarnette, Roger
Molloy, D. William
Paúl, Constança
Leahy-Warren, Patricia

Source

Journal of Aging Research

Issue

Vol. 2015, Issue 2015 (31 Dec. 2015), pp.1-7, 7 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2015-08-05

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

7

Abstract EN

The Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC) is a short, global risk assessment to identify community-dwelling older adults’ one-year risk of institutionalisation, hospitalisation, and death.

We investigated the contribution that the three components of the RISC (concern, its severity, and the ability of the caregiver network to manage concern) make to the accuracy of the instrument, across its three domains (mental state, activities of daily living (ADL), and medical state), by comparing their accuracy to other assessment instruments in the prospective Community Assessment of Risk and Treatment Strategies study.

RISC scores were available for 782 patients.

Across all three domains each subtest more accurately predicted institutionalisation compared to hospitalisation or death.

The caregiver network’s ability to manage ADL more accurately predicted institutionalisation (AUC 0.68) compared to hospitalisation (AUC 0.57, P=0.01) or death (AUC 0.59, P=0.046), comparing favourably with the Barthel Index (AUC 0.67).

The severity of ADL (AUC 0.63), medical state (AUC 0.62), Clinical Frailty Scale (AUC 0.67), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (AUC 0.66) scores had similar accuracy in predicting mortality.

Risk of hospitalisation was difficult to predict.

Thus, each component, and particularly the caregiver network, had reasonable accuracy in predicting institutionalisation.

No subtest or assessment instrument accurately predicted risk of hospitalisation.

American Psychological Association (APA)

O’Caoimh, Rónán& FitzGerald, Carol& Cronin, Una& Svendrovski, Anton& Gao, Yang& Healy, Elizabeth…[et al.]. 2015. Which Part of a Short, Global Risk Assessment, the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community, Predicts Adverse Healthcare Outcomes?. Journal of Aging Research،Vol. 2015, no. 2015, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1067264

Modern Language Association (MLA)

O’Caoimh, Rónán…[et al.]. Which Part of a Short, Global Risk Assessment, the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community, Predicts Adverse Healthcare Outcomes?. Journal of Aging Research No. 2015 (2015), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1067264

American Medical Association (AMA)

O’Caoimh, Rónán& FitzGerald, Carol& Cronin, Una& Svendrovski, Anton& Gao, Yang& Healy, Elizabeth…[et al.]. Which Part of a Short, Global Risk Assessment, the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community, Predicts Adverse Healthcare Outcomes?. Journal of Aging Research. 2015. Vol. 2015, no. 2015, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1067264

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1067264