الحجاج الفلسفي التداولي صورته المناظرة الإسلامية : قراءة في أصول الحوار و تجديد علم الكلام للدكتور طه عبد الرحمن

Abstract EN

Philosopher, Taha Abdul Rahman believes that the pilgrims philosophical Deliberative is «the effectiveness of the evidentiary rhetoric, its building view view, or challenge it, and conceded to convince third parties rightness opinion before or invalidity of the objector opinion on it based on the Moadat search for philosophical truth.

" This is making the pilgrims philosophical Deliberative building Mtnuya Tkablaa of conflict between exhibitors and contestants, so that the respective heads mechanisms persuasive private and specific rights and duties; this interview Almtnoah that will change ratifications or beliefs opposite, knowing that change something with the aim intended is what is termed as the "act"; and as long as desertification change Protect against or Belief interdependency between pilgrims in the opposite philosophical, this is determined by the pilgrims as a reactant process.

Thus, Dr.

Taha Abdel-Rahman concluded that each explanatory speech is based on the "interview" and the "reaction" directed is called a "debate.

" This definition is based on the fact that the "viewer" was an opponent or objector, and that his presentation or objection had a legitimate objective effect in endorsing others He was an opponent or an opponent.

Based on the above, I thought that my study about what Dr.

Taha Abdel Rahman wrote in his book "The Origins of Dialogue and the Renewal of the Science of Speech", that the pilgrims philosophical deliberative image of the Islamic debate.