Computed Tomography Analysis of Postsurgery Femoral Component Rotation Based on a Force Sensing Device Method versus Hypothetical Rotational Alignment Based on Anatomical Landmark Methods: A Pilot Study

Joint Authors

Dettmer, Marius
Pourmoghaddam, Amir
Kreuzer, Stefan W.
Leffers, Kevin J.
Johnson, Clint W.

Source

Advances in Orthopedics

Issue

Vol. 2016, Issue 2016 (31 Dec. 2016), pp.1-8, 8 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2016-01-04

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

8

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Rotation of the femoral component is an important aspect of knee arthroplasty, due to its effects on postsurgery knee kinematics and associated functional outcomes.

It is still debated which method for establishing rotational alignment is preferable in orthopedic surgery.

We compared force sensing based femoral component rotation with traditional anatomic landmark methods to investigate which method is more accurate in terms of alignment to the true transepicondylar axis.

Thirty-one patients underwent computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with femoral rotation established via a force sensor.

During surgery, three alternative hypothetical femoral rotational alignments were assessed, based on transepicondylar axis, anterior-posterior axis, or the utilization of a posterior condyles referencing jig.

Postoperative computed tomography scans were obtained to investigate rotation characteristics.

Significant differences in rotation characteristics were found between rotation according to DKB and other methods (P<0.05).

Soft tissue balancing resulted in smaller deviation from anatomical epicondylar axis than any other method.

77% of operated knees were within a range of ±3° of rotation.

Only between 48% and 52% of knees would have been rotated appropriately using the other methods.

The current results indicate that force sensors may be valuable for establishing correct femoral rotation.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Kreuzer, Stefan W.& Pourmoghaddam, Amir& Leffers, Kevin J.& Johnson, Clint W.& Dettmer, Marius. 2016. Computed Tomography Analysis of Postsurgery Femoral Component Rotation Based on a Force Sensing Device Method versus Hypothetical Rotational Alignment Based on Anatomical Landmark Methods: A Pilot Study. Advances in Orthopedics،Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1096549

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Kreuzer, Stefan W.…[et al.]. Computed Tomography Analysis of Postsurgery Femoral Component Rotation Based on a Force Sensing Device Method versus Hypothetical Rotational Alignment Based on Anatomical Landmark Methods: A Pilot Study. Advances in Orthopedics No. 2016 (2016), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1096549

American Medical Association (AMA)

Kreuzer, Stefan W.& Pourmoghaddam, Amir& Leffers, Kevin J.& Johnson, Clint W.& Dettmer, Marius. Computed Tomography Analysis of Postsurgery Femoral Component Rotation Based on a Force Sensing Device Method versus Hypothetical Rotational Alignment Based on Anatomical Landmark Methods: A Pilot Study. Advances in Orthopedics. 2016. Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1096549

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1096549