Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful?

Joint Authors

Park, Sang Hyuk
Jang, Seongsoo
Park, Chan-Jeoung
Chi, Hyun-Sook

Source

BioMed Research International

Issue

Vol. 2016, Issue 2016 (31 Dec. 2016), pp.1-6, 6 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2016-08-17

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

6

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Background.

According to revised classification criteria of true antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, at least one of three antiphospholipid antibodies should be present on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart.

However, it can be inconvenient to perform follow-up tests with interval of 12 weeks.

We investigated clinical application of follow-up tests with interval of 12 weeks.

Method.

Totals of 67, 199, and 332 patients tested positive initially for the lupus anticoagulants confirm, the anti- β 2 glycoprotein-I antibody, and the anti-cardiolipin antibody test, respectively, from Jan 2007 to Jul 2009.

We investigated clinical symptoms of patients, follow-up interval, and results of each test.

Results.

Among patients with initial test positive, 1.5%–8.5% were subjected to follow-up tests at interval of more than 12 weeks.

Among 25 patients with negative conversion in tests, patients with interval of more than 12 weeks showed clinical symptom positivity of 33.3%, which was higher than that of 12.5% with 6–12 weeks.

Among 34 patients with persistent test positive, clinical symptoms positivity trended to be more evident in patients at interval of 6–12 weeks (47.4% versus 26.7%, P = 0.191 ) than more than 12 weeks.

Conclusion.

Less than 10% of patients with initial test positive had follow-up tests at interval of more than 12 weeks and the patients with persistent test positive at interval of more than 12 weeks showed trends toward having lower clinical symptoms than 6–12 weeks.

More research is needed focused on the evidence that follow-up test at interval of more than 12 weeks should be performed instead of 6 weeks.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Park, Sang Hyuk& Jang, Seongsoo& Park, Chan-Jeoung& Chi, Hyun-Sook. 2016. Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful?. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1097125

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Park, Sang Hyuk…[et al.]. Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful?. BioMed Research International No. 2016 (2016), pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1097125

American Medical Association (AMA)

Park, Sang Hyuk& Jang, Seongsoo& Park, Chan-Jeoung& Chi, Hyun-Sook. Clinical Application of Revised Laboratory Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: Is the Follow-Up Interval of 12 Weeks Instead of 6 Weeks Significantly Useful?. BioMed Research International. 2016. Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1097125

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1097125