Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Brief Pain Inventory in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Joint Authors

Jelsness-Jørgensen, Lars-Petter
Grimstad, Tore
Jahnsen, Jørgen
Prytz Berset, Ingrid
Hovde, Øistein
Torp, Roald
Frigstad, Svein Oskar
Huppertz-Hauss, Gert
Bernklev, Tomm
Opheim, Randi
Moum, Bjørn

Source

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Issue

Vol. 2016, Issue 2016 (31 Dec. 2016), pp.1-10, 10 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2016-06-19

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

10

Main Subjects

Diseases
Medicine

Abstract EN

Background and Aims.

No patient-reported outcome measures targeting pain have yet been validated for use in IBD patients.

Consequently, the aim of this study was to test the psychometrical properties of the brief pain inventory (BPI) in an outpatient population with IBD.

Methods.

Participants were recruited from nine hospitals in the southeastern and western parts of Norway.

Clinical and sociodemographic data were collected, and participants completed the BPI, as well as the Short-Form 36 (SF-36).

Results.

In total, 410 patients were included.

The BPI displayed high correlations with the bodily pain dimension of the SF-36, as well as moderate correlations with disease activity indices.

The BPI also displayed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.91, regardless of diagnosis) and good to excellent test-retest values (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.84–0.90 and Kappa values > .70).

In UC, calculation of responsiveness revealed that only BPI interference in patients reporting improvement reached the threshold of 0.2.

In CD, Cohen’s d ranged from 0.26 to 0.68.

Conclusions.

The BPI may serve as an important supplement in patient-reported outcome measurement in IBD.

There is need to confirm responsiveness in future studies.

Moreover, responsiveness should ideally be investigated using changes in objective markers of inflammation.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Jelsness-Jørgensen, Lars-Petter& Moum, Bjørn& Grimstad, Tore& Jahnsen, Jørgen& Opheim, Randi& Prytz Berset, Ingrid…[et al.]. 2016. Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Brief Pain Inventory in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology،Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1099890

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Jelsness-Jørgensen, Lars-Petter…[et al.]. Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Brief Pain Inventory in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology No. 2016 (2016), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1099890

American Medical Association (AMA)

Jelsness-Jørgensen, Lars-Petter& Moum, Bjørn& Grimstad, Tore& Jahnsen, Jørgen& Opheim, Randi& Prytz Berset, Ingrid…[et al.]. Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Brief Pain Inventory in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2016. Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1099890

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1099890