A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy

Joint Authors

Kim, Hong Kyun
Eum, Sun Jung
Kim, Myung Jun

Source

Journal of Ophthalmology

Issue

Vol. 2016, Issue 2016 (31 Dec. 2016), pp.1-7, 7 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2016-03-29

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

7

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Purpose.

To evaluate surgical efficacy of in situ refixation technique for dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL).

Methods.

This was a single-center retrospective case series.

34 patients (34 eyes) who underwent sclera fixation for dislocated IOLs combined with vitrectomy were studied.

Of 34 eyes, 17 eyes underwent IOL exchange and the other 17 eyes underwent in situ refixation.

Results.

Mean follow-up period was 6 months.

Mean logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups 6 months after surgery (0.10±0.03 in the IOL exchange group and 0.10±0.05 in the refixation group; p=0.065).

Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was significantly lower in the refixation group (0.79±0.41) than in the IOL exchange group (1.29±0.46) (p=0.004) at 3 months, which persisted to 6 months (1.13±0.18 in the IOL exchange group and 0.74±0.11 in the refixation group; p=0.006).

Postoperative complications occurred in 3 eyes in the IOL exchange group (17.6%) and 2 eyes in the refixation group (11.8%).

However, all of the patients were well managed without additional surgery.

Conclusion.

The in situ refixation technique should be preferentially considered if surgery is indicated since it seemed to produce a sustained less SIA compared to IOL exchange.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Eum, Sun Jung& Kim, Myung Jun& Kim, Hong Kyun. 2016. A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy. Journal of Ophthalmology،Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1110014

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Eum, Sun Jung…[et al.]. A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy. Journal of Ophthalmology No. 2016 (2016), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1110014

American Medical Association (AMA)

Eum, Sun Jung& Kim, Myung Jun& Kim, Hong Kyun. A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2016. Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1110014

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1110014