![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Comment on “Surgically Resected Gall Bladder: Is Histopathology Needed for All?”
Author
Source
Issue
Vol. 2016, Issue 2016 (31 Dec. 2016), pp.1-2, 2 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2016-07-17
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
2
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
I read with interest the manuscript by Talreja and colleagues [1] that questions the need for routine histopathological examination of the “apparently normal” gall bladder following cholecystectomy based on their retrospective examination of their data in which 11 patients (with gall bladder cancer) out of 964 (patients who underwent a cholecystectomy during the study period) had either preoperative imaging or intraoperatively visible gross features of wall thickening.
This study is not the first [2] and it will certainly not be the last to raise this contentious issue.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Barreto, Savio George. 2016. Comment on “Surgically Resected Gall Bladder: Is Histopathology Needed for All?”. Surgery Research and Practice،Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-2.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1118461
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Barreto, Savio George. Comment on “Surgically Resected Gall Bladder: Is Histopathology Needed for All?”. Surgery Research and Practice No. 2016 (2016), pp.1-2.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1118461
American Medical Association (AMA)
Barreto, Savio George. Comment on “Surgically Resected Gall Bladder: Is Histopathology Needed for All?”. Surgery Research and Practice. 2016. Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-2.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1118461
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-1118461