Comment on “Surgically Resected Gall Bladder: Is Histopathology Needed for All?”

Author

Barreto, Savio George

Source

Surgery Research and Practice

Issue

Vol. 2016, Issue 2016 (31 Dec. 2016), pp.1-2, 2 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2016-07-17

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

2

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

I read with interest the manuscript by Talreja and colleagues [1] that questions the need for routine histopathological examination of the “apparently normal” gall bladder following cholecystectomy based on their retrospective examination of their data in which 11 patients (with gall bladder cancer) out of 964 (patients who underwent a cholecystectomy during the study period) had either preoperative imaging or intraoperatively visible gross features of wall thickening.

This study is not the first [2] and it will certainly not be the last to raise this contentious issue.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Barreto, Savio George. 2016. Comment on “Surgically Resected Gall Bladder: Is Histopathology Needed for All?”. Surgery Research and Practice،Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-2.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1118461

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Barreto, Savio George. Comment on “Surgically Resected Gall Bladder: Is Histopathology Needed for All?”. Surgery Research and Practice No. 2016 (2016), pp.1-2.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1118461

American Medical Association (AMA)

Barreto, Savio George. Comment on “Surgically Resected Gall Bladder: Is Histopathology Needed for All?”. Surgery Research and Practice. 2016. Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-2.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1118461

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1118461