An Assessment of GCM Performance at a Regional Scale Using a Score-Based Method

Abstract EN

A multicriteria score-based method was developed to assess the performances of 18 general circulation models (GCMs) in the study region from 1970 to 2005.

The results indicate the following.

(1) GCMs simulate temperature better than rainfall.

The temporal and spatial distributions of simulated temperature performed well compared with those from the observations.

In comparison to temperature, the spatial distribution of simulated precipitation performed poorly.

Most of the GCMs underestimated temperature and overestimated precipitation.

(2) The Grubbs test was used to detect anomalous moving changes in the rank score (RS) results; the inm-cm4 and ipsl-cm5b-lr models were rejected when simulating temperature, while the bnu-esm and canesm2 models performed poorly when simulating precipitation.

(3) Adding or removing any criterion does not significantly influence the RS result, which indicates that the multicriteria score-based method is robust.

The advantages of using multicriteria score-based method to assess GCMs performance were demonstrated, and this method also provides a more comprehensive assessment when compared with the single-criterion method.

The multicriteria method could replace other criteria as the research requirements and could be easily extended to different study regions; the results could be used for better informed regional climate change impact analyses.