Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale
Joint Authors
Tokuhashi, Yasuaki
Maseda, Masafumi
Nakahashi, Masahiro
Sawada, Hirokatsu
Matsumoto, Koji
Miyakata, Hiroyuki
Soma, Hirotoki
Uei, Hiroshi
Source
Issue
Vol. 2018, Issue 2018 (31 Dec. 2018), pp.1-9, 9 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2018-11-08
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
9
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Purpose.
Minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) using percutaneous pedicle screws plays a significant role in palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumors.
However, few studies have investigated surgical outcomes based on the epidural spinal cord compression scale (ESCCS).
The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes of metastatic spinal tumors as evaluated by ESCCS in patients treated by MISt.
Methods.
The subjects were 56 patients who underwent MISt for metastatic spinal tumors, including 34 patients with ESCCS 2 or milder (group A) and 22 patients with ESCCS 3 (group B).
We analyzed baseline characteristics, perioperative factors and clinical results such as postoperative survival time, neurological outcomes, Barthel Index for activities of daily living (ADL), visual analogue scale (VAS), and the rate of discharge to home.
Results.
The baseline age (P=0.07), tumor diagnosis (P=0.23), spinal level of compression (P=0.35), American Spinal Injury Association classification (P=0.49), revised Tokuhashi score (P=0.92), spinal instability neoplastic score (P=0.28), VAS (P=0.35), Barthel Index (P=0.07), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (P=0.76), and type of surgery (P=0.40) did not differ significantly between the two groups.
The median postoperative survival time did not differ significantly between the groups (12.0 versus 15.0 months, P=0.60).
Neurological improvement by at least 1 grade or maintenance of grade E was favorable in group A.
Patients in group A had less posterior decompression (P=0.006), a higher rate of chemotherapy (P=0.009), a higher postoperative Barthel Index (P=0.04), and a higher rate of discharge to home (P=0.01) and no patients died in the hospital (P=0.004).
Conclusions.
No significant difference was noted in the postoperative survival time between the 2 groups.
Patients in the ESCCS 2 or milder group had favorable neurological improvement, higher rates of chemotherapy, better postoperative ADL, and the higher rate of discharge to home.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Uei, Hiroshi& Tokuhashi, Yasuaki& Maseda, Masafumi& Nakahashi, Masahiro& Sawada, Hirokatsu& Matsumoto, Koji…[et al.]. 2018. Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1124195
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Uei, Hiroshi…[et al.]. Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale. BioMed Research International No. 2018 (2018), pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1124195
American Medical Association (AMA)
Uei, Hiroshi& Tokuhashi, Yasuaki& Maseda, Masafumi& Nakahashi, Masahiro& Sawada, Hirokatsu& Matsumoto, Koji…[et al.]. Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale. BioMed Research International. 2018. Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1124195
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-1124195