Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale

Joint Authors

Tokuhashi, Yasuaki
Maseda, Masafumi
Nakahashi, Masahiro
Sawada, Hirokatsu
Matsumoto, Koji
Miyakata, Hiroyuki
Soma, Hirotoki
Uei, Hiroshi

Source

BioMed Research International

Issue

Vol. 2018, Issue 2018 (31 Dec. 2018), pp.1-9, 9 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2018-11-08

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

9

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Purpose.

Minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) using percutaneous pedicle screws plays a significant role in palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumors.

However, few studies have investigated surgical outcomes based on the epidural spinal cord compression scale (ESCCS).

The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes of metastatic spinal tumors as evaluated by ESCCS in patients treated by MISt.

Methods.

The subjects were 56 patients who underwent MISt for metastatic spinal tumors, including 34 patients with ESCCS 2 or milder (group A) and 22 patients with ESCCS 3 (group B).

We analyzed baseline characteristics, perioperative factors and clinical results such as postoperative survival time, neurological outcomes, Barthel Index for activities of daily living (ADL), visual analogue scale (VAS), and the rate of discharge to home.

Results.

The baseline age (P=0.07), tumor diagnosis (P=0.23), spinal level of compression (P=0.35), American Spinal Injury Association classification (P=0.49), revised Tokuhashi score (P=0.92), spinal instability neoplastic score (P=0.28), VAS (P=0.35), Barthel Index (P=0.07), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (P=0.76), and type of surgery (P=0.40) did not differ significantly between the two groups.

The median postoperative survival time did not differ significantly between the groups (12.0 versus 15.0 months, P=0.60).

Neurological improvement by at least 1 grade or maintenance of grade E was favorable in group A.

Patients in group A had less posterior decompression (P=0.006), a higher rate of chemotherapy (P=0.009), a higher postoperative Barthel Index (P=0.04), and a higher rate of discharge to home (P=0.01) and no patients died in the hospital (P=0.004).

Conclusions.

No significant difference was noted in the postoperative survival time between the 2 groups.

Patients in the ESCCS 2 or milder group had favorable neurological improvement, higher rates of chemotherapy, better postoperative ADL, and the higher rate of discharge to home.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Uei, Hiroshi& Tokuhashi, Yasuaki& Maseda, Masafumi& Nakahashi, Masahiro& Sawada, Hirokatsu& Matsumoto, Koji…[et al.]. 2018. Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1124195

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Uei, Hiroshi…[et al.]. Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale. BioMed Research International No. 2018 (2018), pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1124195

American Medical Association (AMA)

Uei, Hiroshi& Tokuhashi, Yasuaki& Maseda, Masafumi& Nakahashi, Masahiro& Sawada, Hirokatsu& Matsumoto, Koji…[et al.]. Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale. BioMed Research International. 2018. Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1124195

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1124195