Should We Always Use Antibiotics after Urodynamic Studies in High-Risk Patients?

Abstract EN

Aim.

The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a phytotherapic drug (Canephron N) in preventing urinary tract infection (UTI) in high-risk women undergoing urodynamic studies (UDS).

Methods.

The study protocol was approved by the local institutional ethical committee.

Adult women with at least one risk factor for acquiring UTI (defined as: age over 70, elevated postvoid residual urine>100 ml, recurrent UTI, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) ≥II in POP-Q scale, and neurogenic bladder) had received after UDS either a single oral dose of fosfomycin trometamol (FT) (3 grams) or a phytodrug containing centaury herb, lovage root, and rosemary leaves (5 ml taken orally three times daily for one week).

All patients included in the study had no pyuria according to urine dipstick (nitrite and/or blood and/or leukocyte esterase) and negative urine culture (CFU < 103/ml) before UDS.

Urine samples were also tested 7 days after UDS.

Results.

Seventy-two high-risk participants completed the study.

Seven days after urodynamic studies UTI symptoms, pyuria (nitrite and/or blood and/or leukocyte esterase) and bacteriuria with E.

coli occurred in two patients (one (2.8%) in the FT and one (2.7%) in the phytodrug group, respectively).

No statistical differences in UTI incidence were found between both treatment groups.

We did not observe any additional adverse events in both groups.

The major disadvantage of prophylaxis with the phytodrug as compared to FT was the necessity of continuing therapy for 7 days.

Conclusion.

Prophylaxis of UTI with a phytodrug (Canephron N) may be considered a good alternative to antibiotic prophylaxis use after UDS in high-risk female patients.