Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing

Joint Authors

Li, Zhaoshen
Ma, Su
Feng, Lili
Jiang, Ziyi
Gao, Xian
Long, Xisha
Zhuang, Shaonan
Ding, Wenxia
Chen, Taiyao
Zhang, Lingjuan
Xi, Huijun
Zhang, Hongzhi

Source

BioMed Research International

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-6, 6 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2019-12-03

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

6

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Objective.

Compare the effects of three sampling methods on the microbiological monitoring results after reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopes, providing scientific basis for improving the monitoring quality of gastrointestinal endoscope cleaning and disinfection.

Method.

Gastrointestinal endoscopes after reprocessing were selected randomly at the gastrointestinal endoscopy center of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai from October 2018 to February 2019.

The endoscopes selected were all sampled in three different methods under continuous sampling and intermittent sampling respectively.

Methods used includes, the biopsy channel group (Group A), the entire channel group (Group B), and the disc brush group (Group C).

Then the colony forming units (CFU/piece) were counted in the laboratory.

Results.

A total of 12 endoscopes were sampled by using continuous sampling approach, in which the detection rate of bacteria in disc brush group (33.3%) and entire channel group (33.3%) was higher than biopsy channel group (8.3%).

Among the 12 endoscopes sampled with intermittent approach, the detection rate of bacteria from high to low was the disc brush group (50%), the entire channel group (41.7%), and the biopsy channel group (8.3%).

Conclusion.

Different sampling methods will lead to the difference of microbiological culture results after reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscope, indicating that the improved sampling method is beneficial to objectively reflect the endoscope cleaning and disinfection effect, and improve the monitoring quality of endoscope disinfection.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Ma, Su& Feng, Lili& Jiang, Ziyi& Gao, Xian& Long, Xisha& Zhuang, Shaonan…[et al.]. 2019. Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1127627

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Ma, Su…[et al.]. Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing. BioMed Research International No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1127627

American Medical Association (AMA)

Ma, Su& Feng, Lili& Jiang, Ziyi& Gao, Xian& Long, Xisha& Zhuang, Shaonan…[et al.]. Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing. BioMed Research International. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1127627

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1127627