Validity of Measurement for Trailing Limb Angle and Propulsion Force during Gait Using a Magnetic Inertial Measurement Unit

Abstract EN

Propulsion force and trailing limb angle (TLA) are meaningful indicators for evaluating quality of gait.

This study examined the validity of measurement for TLA and propulsion force during various gait conditions using magnetic inertial measurement units (IMU), based on measurements using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and a force platform.

Eighteen healthy males (mean age 25.2 ± 3.2 years, body height 1.70 ± 0.06 m) walked with and without trunk fluctuation at preferred, slow, and fast velocities.

IMU were fixed on the thorax, lumbar spine, and right thigh and shank.

IMU calculated the acceleration and tilt angles in a global coordinate system.

TLA, consisting of a line connecting the hip joint with the ankle joint, and the laboratory’s vertical axis at late stance in the sagittal plane, was calculated from thigh and shank segment angles obtained by IMU, and coordinate data from the motion analysis system.

Propulsion force was estimated by the increment of velocity calculated from anterior acceleration measured by IMU fixed on the thorax and lumbar spine, and normalized impulse of the anterior component of ground reaction force (AGRF) during late stance.

Similarity of TLA measured by IMU and the motion analysis system was tested by the coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and root mean square (RMS) of measurement error.

Relationships between normalized impulse of AGRF and increments of velocity, as measured by IMU, were tested using correlation analysis.

CMC of TLA was 0.956–0.959.

ICC between peak TLAs was 0.831–0.876 (p<0.001), and RMS of error was 1.42°–1.92°.

Velocity increment calculated from acceleration on the lumbar region showed strong correlations with normalized impulse of AGRF (r=0.755–0.892, p<0.001).

These results indicated a high validity of estimation of TLA and propulsion force by IMU during various gait conditions; these methods would be useful for best clinical practice.