The Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery Performed Using Fully Guided Templates versus Pilot-Drill Guided Templates

Abstract EN

Purpose.

Computer-assisted stereolithographically guided surgery allows an ideal implant placement for prosthetic restoration.

Two types of stereolithographic templates are currently available: a fully guided template and a pilot-drill guided template.

The purpose of this study was (i) to evaluate the accuracy of implant insertion using these types of surgical templates and (ii) to define parameters influencing accuracy.

Materials and Methods.

20 patients were enrolled and divided into 2 study groups: in group A, implants were placed using CAD-CAM templates with fully guided sleeves; in group B, implants were placed with a template with only pilot-drill guided sleeves.

Pre- and postoperative computed tomographies were used to measure differences between final positions of implants and virtually planned positions.

Three linear discrepancies (coronal, apical, and depth) and two angular ones (buccolingual and mesiodistal) were measured.

Correlations between accuracy and jaws of interest, implant length and diameters, and type of edentulism were also analysed.

Results.

A total of 50 implants were inserted in 15 patients using CAD-CAM templates: 23 implants in group A and 27 in group B.

The mean coronal deviations were 1.16 and 1.11 mm (P = 0.35), respectively; the mean apical deviations were 1.65 and 1.71 mm (P = 0.22); the mean depth deviations were 0.95 and −0.68 mm (P = 0.032); the mean buccolingual angular deviations were 4.16° and 6.72° (P = 0.042); and the mean mesiodistal ones were 2.81° and 5.61° (P = 0.029).

In addition, the accuracy was statistically influenced only by implant diameter for coronal discrepancy (P = 0.035) and by jaw of interest for mesiodistal angulation (P = 0.045).

Conclusion.

Fully guided implant surgery was more accurate than pilot-drill guided surgery for different parameters.

For both types of surgery, a safety margin of at least 2mm should be preserved during implant planning to prevent damage to nearby anatomical structures.