Psychological Intervention in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

Joint Authors

Gómez-de-Regil, Lizzette
Estrella-Castillo, Damaris F.
Vega-Cauich, Julio

Source

Behavioural Neurology

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-8, 8 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2019-05-02

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

8

Main Subjects

Biology
Medicine

Abstract EN

Objective.

To provide a brief and comprehensive summary of recent research regarding psychological interventions for patients surviving a traumatic brain injury.

Methods.

A bibliographical search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycNET, Scopus, ResearchGate, and Google Scholar online databases.

Analysis included distribution by year of publication, age stage of participants (paediatric, adult), location of the research team, study design, type of intervention, and main outcome variables.

Results.

The initial search eliciting 1541 citations was reduced to 62 relevant papers.

Most publications had adult samples (88.7%).

The United States outstands as the country with more research (58.1%); Latin America countries provided no results.

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) was the most widely used approach for treatment of (sub)clinical mental disturbances (41.9%).

Neuropsychological interventions were scarce (4.8%).

Outcome measures included psychiatric disorders (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety) (37.1%), postconcussive symptoms (16.1%), cognitive and functional deficits (48.1%), and social and psychological dimensions (62.9%).

Conclusions.

CBT outstands as the preferred therapeutic approach for treating behavioural and emotional disturbances.

Also, other related therapies such as dialectical behaviour, mindfulness, and acceptance and commitment therapies have been proposed, and probably in the years to come, more literature regarding their effectiveness will be available.

On the other hand, evidence showed that interventions from the field of neuropsychology are minimal if compared with its contribution to assessment.

Future research should be aimed at performing studies on more diverse populations (e.g., nonmilitary communities and paediatric and Latin American populations) and at controlling designs to examine the therapeutic efficacy of psychotherapeutic and neurocognitive rehabilitation interventions and compare amelioration by injury severity, age of patients, and clinical profile, in the hopes of creating better guidelines for practitioners.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Gómez-de-Regil, Lizzette& Estrella-Castillo, Damaris F.& Vega-Cauich, Julio. 2019. Psychological Intervention in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. Behavioural Neurology،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129004

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Gómez-de-Regil, Lizzette…[et al.]. Psychological Intervention in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. Behavioural Neurology No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129004

American Medical Association (AMA)

Gómez-de-Regil, Lizzette& Estrella-Castillo, Damaris F.& Vega-Cauich, Julio. Psychological Intervention in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. Behavioural Neurology. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129004

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1129004