Intestinal Microbiome Changes in Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT)‎ vs. FMT Enriched with Lactobacillus in the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection

Joint Authors

Morfín-Otero, Rayo
Garza-González, Elvira
Mendoza-Olazarán, Soraya
Ramírez-Fontes, Andrea
Rodríguez-Zulueta, Patricia
Flores-Treviño, Samantha
Bocanegra-Ibarias, Paola
Maldonado-Garza, Héctor
Camacho-Ortiz, Adrián

Source

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-7, 7 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2019-12-31

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

7

Main Subjects

Diseases
Medicine

Abstract EN

Aim.

In this study, we conducted a comparative study to explore the differences in therapeutic efficacy and intestinal microbiome of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) vs.

FMT in addition with Lactobacillus (FMT-L) for treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (R-CDI).

Methods.

We designed a double-blinded randomized comparative two-arm pilot multicenter study to assess the efficacy and impact in the intestinal microbiome of standard capsules of FMT vs.

FMT-L enriched with 3 species of Lactobacillus for patients with R-CDI.

A 90-day follow-up of 21 patients was performed, starting at the beginning of the study.

From the selected patients, fecal samples were obtained at days 0, 3, 7, and 28 after treatment.

Fecal samples and FMT were analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing.

Results.

We included 21 patients (13 in the FMT group and 8 in the FMT-L group).

Overall, both groups had a reduction in bowel movements per day, from 8.6 to 3.2 in the first 48 h (62.7% reduction, p=0.001).

No severe adverse reactions or recurrences were recorded.

Firmicutes were the most abundant phylum in donors.

A low relative abundance of Proteobacteria was detected and mostly found in patients even at higher proportions than the donor.

The donor’s pool also had relatively few Bacteroidetes, and some patients showed a higher abundance of this phylum.

Based on the ANOSIM R values, there is a significant difference between the microbial communities of basal samples and samples collected on day 7 (p=0.045) and at day 28 (0.041).

Conclusion.

Fecal microbiota transplant by capsules was clinically and genomically similar between traditional FMT and enriched FMT with Lactobacillus spp.

Restoration of bacterial diversity and resolution of dysbiosis at days 7 and 28 were observed.

Patients with a first episode of recurrence treated with FMT had an excellent response without severe adverse events; FMT should be considered as an early treatment during R-CDI.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Garza-González, Elvira& Mendoza-Olazarán, Soraya& Morfín-Otero, Rayo& Ramírez-Fontes, Andrea& Rodríguez-Zulueta, Patricia& Flores-Treviño, Samantha…[et al.]. 2019. Intestinal Microbiome Changes in Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) vs. FMT Enriched with Lactobacillus in the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129844

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Garza-González, Elvira…[et al.]. Intestinal Microbiome Changes in Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) vs. FMT Enriched with Lactobacillus in the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129844

American Medical Association (AMA)

Garza-González, Elvira& Mendoza-Olazarán, Soraya& Morfín-Otero, Rayo& Ramírez-Fontes, Andrea& Rodríguez-Zulueta, Patricia& Flores-Treviño, Samantha…[et al.]. Intestinal Microbiome Changes in Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) vs. FMT Enriched with Lactobacillus in the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1129844

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1129844